Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1994, Vol 57, 1466-1478

PAPERS

Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis

GR Young, PR Humphrey, MD Shaw, TE Nixon and ET Smith
Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Rice, Liverpool, UK.

The results of a prospective study comparing ultrasound, intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of the degree of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis are reported in patients with symptoms of recent carotid territory ischaemia. A total of 70 patients and 137 vessels were examined by all three techniques. The results obtained by each technique were reported blind. The mean difference (SD) for the comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography was -0.7 (14)%, for ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography 3.1 (15)%, and for magnetic resonance angiography and ultrasound -3.8 (15)%. The level of agreement was greater for the more tightly stenosed vessels. With the assumption that the results of the digital subtraction angiogram reflect the true situation, the sensitivity and specificity in the detection of > or = 30% stenoses were 93% and 82% with ultrasound and 89% and 82% with magnetic resonance angiography; for stenoses > or = 70% 93% and 92% with ultrasound and 90% and 95% with magnetic resonance angiography; and for stenoses of 70-99% 89% and 93% with ultrasound and 86% and 93% with magnetic resonance angiography. For occlusion the values were 93% and 99% with ultrasound and 80% and 99% with magnetic resonance angiography. Increased sensitivity and specificity were obtained when analysis was confined to those vessels in which ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography were in agreement over classification. It is thus possible to accurately categorize the degree of stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery from a combination of ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography. The adoption of this combination for the investigation of patients before carotid endarterectomy removes the risk associated with conventional angiography and represents an important advance in the management of carotid stenosis.

© 1994 by Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Debrey, H. Yu, J. K. Lynch, K.-O. Lovblad, V. L. Wright, S.-J. D. Janket, and A. E. Baird Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Internal Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2237 - 2248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.L. Cuffe and P.M. Rothwell Effect of Nonoptimal Imaging on the Relationship Between the Measured Degree of Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Ischemic Stroke Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1785 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. K.S. U-King-Im, R. A. Trivedi, J. J. Cross, N. J.P. Higgins, W. Hollingworth, M. Graves, I. Joubert, P. J. Kirkpatrick, N. M. Antoun, and J. H. Gillard Measuring Carotid Stenosis on Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Diagnostic Performance and Reproducibility of 3 Different Methods Stroke, September 1, 2004; 35(9): 2083 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. H. Wierks and N. Labropoulos Noninvasive Carotid Imaging Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 89 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Borisch, M. Horn, B. Butz, N. Zorger, B. Draganski, T. Hoelscher, U. Bogdahn, and J. Link Preoperative Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Duplex Sonography with Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1117 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, and M.G. M. Hunink Duplex Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1324 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E Westwood, S. Kelly, E. Berry, J. M Bamford, M. J Gough, C M. Airey, J. F M Meaney, L. M Davies, J. Cullingworth, and M. A Smith Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review BMJ, January 26, 2002; 324(7331): 198 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J M Wardlaw, S C Lewis, P Humphrey, G Young, D Collie, and C P Warlow How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2001; 71(2): 155 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C.C. Johnston and L. B. Goldstein Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 1009 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. E. H. Elgersma, A. F. J. Wüst, P. C. Buijs, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, and W. P. T. M. Mali Multidirectional Depiction of Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: Three-dimensional Time-of-Flight MR Angiography versus Rotational and Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 511 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				O. E. H. Elgersma, P. C. Buijs, A. F. J. Wüst, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, and W. P. T. M. Mali Maximum Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: Assessment with Rotational Angiography versus Conventional Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 777 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Yuan, K. W. Beach, L. H. Smith Jr, and T. S. Hatsukami Measurement of Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque Size In Vivo Using High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, December 15, 1998; 98(24): 2666 - 2671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Managing carotid stenosis DTB, February 1, 1998; 36(2): 9 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Young, W. S. Moore, J. T. Robertson, J. F. Toole, C. B. Ernst, S. N. Cohen, J. P. Broderick, R. J. Dempsey, and J. D. Hosking An Analysis of Perioperative Surgical Mortality and Morbidity in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Stroke, December 1, 1996; 27(12): 2216 - 2224. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G.R. Young, P.R.D. Humphrey, T.E. Nixon, and E.T.S. Smith Variability in Measurement of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis as Displayed by Both Digital Subtraction and Magnetic Resonance Angiography : An Assessment of Three Caliper Techniques and Visual Impression of Stenosis Stroke, March 1, 1996; 27(3): 467 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. Humphrey, P. Enevoldson, G. Young, and P. Harris Should be offered to appropriately selected patients BMJ, April 29, 1995; 310(6987): 1136 - 1136. [Full Text]