JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danziger, N.
Right arrow Articles by Willer, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Danziger, N.
Right arrow Articles by Willer, J. C.

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1995, Vol 58, 222-226


PAPERS

Partial restoration of blink reflex function after spinal accessory- facial nerve anastomosis

N Danziger, B Chassande, G Lamas, I Fligny, J Soudant and JC Willer
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France.

Functional motor control requires perfect matching of the central connections of motoneurons with their peripheral inputs. It is not known, however, to what extent these central circuits are influenced by target muscles, either during development or after a lesion. Surgical interventions aimed at restoring function after peripheral nerve lesions provide an opportunity for studying this interaction in the mature human nervous system. A patient was studied in whom the spinal accessory nerve was anastomosed into a lesioned facial nerve, allowing voluntary contractions of the previously paralysed muscles. This procedure, in addition to replacing the facial neurons at peripheral synapses, allowed a new short latency trigeminospinal accessory reflex of the R1 blink reflex type to be demonstrated, implying that trigeminal neurons had sprouted towards spinal accessory motoneurons over a distance of at least 1 cm. These results show an unexpected influence of the periphery in remodelling central connectivity in humans. The motoneuronal excitability for this R1 reflex response was therefore studied to compare the convergent properties of facial motoneurons (normal side) with those of the spinal accessory motoneurons (operated side) using a classic double shock technique with variable interstimulus intervals (conditioning test stimulus). On the normal side, conditioning stimuli (to the ipsilateral or contralateral infraliminar supraorbital nerve) produced a clearcut facilitation of the R1 blink reflex when the interstimulus interval was 30-80 ms. By contrast, a similar procedure had no effect on the R1 blink reflex mediated via the trigeminal-spinal accessory reflex arc.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


© 1995 by Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1995 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.