JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, I.
Right arrow Articles by Alderson, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, I.
Right arrow Articles by Alderson, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systematic reviews (incl meta-analyses): descriptions
Right arrow Other Neurology
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:729-733 ( November )

Absence of evidence for the effectiveness of five interventions routinely used in the intensive care management of severe head injury: a systematic review

Ian Roberts,a Gillian Schierhout,a Phil Aldersonb

a Child Health Monitoring Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Child Health, University of London, UK, b Cochrane Centre, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Ian Roberts, Child Health Monitoring Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK. Telephone 0044 171 242 9789; fax 0044 171 242 2723.

Received 17 October 1997 and in revised form 26 February 1998; Accepted 5 March 1998

OBJECTIVES---To assess the effectiveness of interventions routinely used in the intensive care management of severe head injury, specifically, the effectiveness of hyperventilation, mannitol, CSF drainage, barbiturates, and corticosteroids.
METHODS---Systematic review of all unconfounded randomised trials, published or unpublished, that were available by August 1996.
RESULTS---None of the interventions has been reliably shown to reduce death or disability after severe head injury. One trial of hyperventilation was identified of 77 participants. The relative risk for death was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.36-1.49), and for death or disability it was 1.14 (95% CI 0.82-1.58). One trial of mannitol was identified of 41 participants. The relative risk for death was 1.75 (95% CI 0.48-6.38), no data were available for disability. No randomised trials of CSF drainage were identified. Two randomised trials of barbiturate therapy were identified, including 126 participants. The pooled relative risk for death was 1.12 (95% CI 0.81-1.54). Disability data were available for one trial. The relative risk for death or disability was 0.96 (95% CI 0.62-1.49). Thirteen randomised trials of corticosteroids were identified, comprising 2073 participants. The pooled relative risk for death was 0.95 (0.84 to 1.07) and for death or disability it was 1.01 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.11). On the basis of the currently available randomised evidence, for every intervention studied it is impossible to refute either a moderate increase or a moderate decrease in the risk of death or disability.
CONCLUSION---Existing trials have been too small to support or refute the existence of a real benefit from using hyperventilation, mannitol, CSF drainage, barbiturates, or corticosteroids. Further large scale randomised trials of these interventions are required.

Keywords: head injuries; systematic review; meta-analysis; randomised controlled trials


© 1998 by Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
G. Chen, J. Shi, W. Jin, L. Wang, W. Xie, J. Sun, and C. Hang
Progesterone Administration Modulates TLRs/NF-{kappa}B Signaling Pathway in Rat Brain after Cortical Contusion
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2008; 38(1): 65 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
I. Roberts, H. Shakur, P. Edwards, D. Yates, and P. Sandercock
Trauma care research and the war on uncertainty
BMJ, November 12, 2005; 331(7525): 1094 - 1096.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
D. W. Wright, J. C. Ritchie, R. E. Mullins, A. L. Kellermann, and D. D. Denson
Steady-State Serum Concentrations of Progesterone Following Continuous Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Acute Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
J. Clin. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 45(6): 640 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
N. Stocchetti, A. I.R. Maas, A. Chieregato, and A. A. van der Plas
Hyperventilation in Head Injury: A Review
Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1812 - 1827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. J. Clayton, R. J. Nelson, and A. R. Manara
Reduction in mortality from severe head injury following introduction of a protocol for intensive care management
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2004; 93(6): 761 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. S. Warner and C. O. Borel
Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury: One Size Does Not Fit All
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1208 - 1210.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
I. Roberts and K. Abbasi
War on the roads: two years on
BMJ, April 10, 2004; 328(7444): 845 - 845.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
C. Tolias and J. Wasserberg
Critical decision making in severe head injury management
Trauma, October 1, 2002; 4(4): 211 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Wasserberg
Treating head injuries
BMJ, August 31, 2002; 325(7362): 454 - 455.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
K. Dickinson, F. Bunn, R. Wentz, P. Edwards, and I. Roberts
Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies
BMJ, May 13, 2000; 320(7245): 1308 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. Alderson and I. Roberts
Should journals publish systematic reviews that find no evidence to guide practice? Examples from injury research
BMJ, February 5, 2000; 320(7231): 376 - 377.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.