JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chandler, B J
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chandler, B J
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:877-880 ( December )

Sex and relationship dysfunction in neurological disability

B J Chandler, S Brown

Hunters Moor Regional Rehabilitation Centre, Hunters Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Correspondence to: Dr B J Chandler, Hunters Moor Regional Rehabilitation Centre, Hunters Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4NR, UK

Received 29 January 1998 and in revised form 14 May 1998; Accepted 20 May 1998

OBJECTIVES---(1) to ascertain how many people with neurological disability experience sexual or relationship problems; (2) to examine the interplay of neurological disability and sexual function within the context of the dyadic relationship; (3) to consider the implications of the results for service provision.
METHODS---A survey of outpatients attending Hunters Moor Regional Rehabilitation Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne over a 6 month period. Standardised measures of sexual function and concern, relationship satisfaction, disability, and mental health were used.
RESULTS---Seventy people were interviewed (18% of the potential study population). Prevalence figures therefore refer to this self selected sample. Fifty one per cent had experienced a change in sexual function and 27% were concerned about this change. Of those in cohabiting relationships 25% were experiencing difficulties. Gender was significantly associated with concern about sexual function, men being more concerned. A high score on the marital adjustment scale indicating relationship dissatisfaction was the best predictor of change in and concern about sexual function. Change in sexual function and duration of illness were the most powerful predictors of relationship dissatisfaction.
CONCLUSION---If concern is taken as an indication of a desire for help more than one in four of this sample required help for sexual dysfunction. Sexual and relationship functioning were very closely associated and dysfunction in either of these areas was the best predictor of dysfunction in the other area. The dyadic relationship is an important institution in the management of disability. Sexual dysfunction can be predictive of difficulties within a relationship. Any service designed to address sexual health should also address relationship issues.

Keywords: sexual dysfunction; relationship satisfaction; neurological disability


© 1998 by Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
R Vazirinejad, J Lilley, and C Ward
A health profile of adults with multiple sclerosis living in the community
Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2008; 14(8): 1099 - 1105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J. Olesen, M. G Baker, T. Freund, M. di Luca, J. Mendlewicz, I. Ragan, and M. Westphal
Consensus document on European brain research
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2006; 77(suppl_1): i1 - i49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.