J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:574-578 ( November )

Review

Psychological impact of genetic testing for Huntington's disease: an update of the literature Bettina Meiser^a, Stewart Dunn^b

^a Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Sydney, Australia, ^b Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Sydney, Australia

Correspondence to: Bettina Meiser b.meiser{at}unsw.edu.au

Received 25 June 1999 and in revised form 7 March 2000; Accepted 21 March 2000

Genetic testing has been available for Huntington's disease for longer than any other adult onset genetic disorder. The discovery of the genetic mutation causing Huntington's disease made possible the use of predictive testing to identify currently unaffected carriers. Concerns have been raised that predictive testing may lead to an increase in deaths by suicide among identified carriers, and these concerns set in motion research to assess the psychological impact of predictive testing for Huntington's disease. This review article provides an overview of the literature and draws implications for clinical practice. About 10%-20% of people at risk request testing when approached by registries or testing centres. Most of the evidence suggests that non-carriers and carriers differ significantly in terms of short term, but not long term, general psychological distress. Adjustment to results was found to depend more on psychological adjustment before testing than the testing result itself. Although risk factors for psychological sequelae have been identified, few adverse events have been described and no obvious contraindications for testing people at risk have been identified. The psychological impact of testing may depend on whether testing was based on linkage analysis or mutation detection. Cohorts enrolled in mutation detection programmes have higher levels of depression before and after testing, compared with people who sought genetic testing when linkage analysis was available. There is evidence that people who choose to be tested are psychologically selected for a favourable response to testing. The impact of testing on people in settings where less intensive counselling protocols and eligibility criteria are used is unknown, and genetic testing is therefore best offered as part of comprehensive specialist counselling.


Keywords: Huntington's disease; psychological adjustment; genetic testing

---

© 2000 by Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wilhelm, K., Meiser, B., Mitchell, P. B., Finch, A. W., Siegel, J. E., Parker, G., Schofield, P. R. (2009). Issues concerning feedback about genetic testing and risk of depression. Br. J. Psychiatry 194: 404-410 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sanderson, S. C., Humphries, S. E., Hubbart, C., Hughes, E., Jarvis, M. J., Wardle, J. (2008). Psychological and Behavioural Impact of Genetic Testing Smokers for Lung Cancer Risk: A Phase II Exploratory Trial. J Health Psychol 13: 481-494 [Abstract]  
• Mrazek, M., Koenig, B., Skime, M., Snyder, K., Hook, C., Black, J. III, Mrazek, D. (2007). Assessing Attitudes about Genetic Testing as a Component of Continuing Medical Education. Acad. Psychiatry 31: 447-451 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Malpas, P J (2006). Why tell asymptomatic children of the risk of an adult-onset disease in the family but not test them for it?. J. Med. Ethics 32: 639-642 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sanderson, S. C., Wardle, J. (2005). Will Genetic Testing for Complex Diseases Increase Motivation to Quit Smoking? Anticipated Reactions in a Survey of Smokers. Health Educ Behav 32: 640-653 [Abstract]  
• Nee, L. E., Tierney, M. C., Lippa, C. F. (2004). Genetic aspects of Alzheimer's disease, Pick's disease, and other dementias. AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 19: 219-225 [Abstract]  
• Timman, R, Stijnen, T, Tibben, A (2004). Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review. J. Med. Genet. 41: e100-e100 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cutler, S. J., Hodgson, L. G. (2003). To test or not to test: Interest in genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease among middle-aged adults. AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 18: 9-20 [Abstract]  
• Witjes-Ane, M-N W, Zwinderman, A H, Tibben, A, van Ommen, G-J B, Roos, R A C (2002). Behavioural complaints in participants who underwent predictive testing for Huntington's disease. J. Med. Genet. 39: 857-862 [Full Text]  
• Palmer, S. C., Kagee, A., Kruus, L., Coyne, J. C., Horowitz, M. J. (2002). Overemphasis of Psychological Risks of Genetic Testing May Have "Dire" Consequences • In Response to Palmer, Kagee, Kruus, Coyne. Psychosomatics 43: 86-88 [Full Text]  
• Duisterhof, M., Trijsburg, R. W, Niermeijer, M. F, Roos, R. A C, Tibben, A. (2001). Psychological studies in Huntington's disease: making up the balance. J. Med. Genet. 38: 852-861 [Full Text]  
• Steinbart, E. J., Smith, C. O., Poorkaj, P., Bird, T. D. (2001). Impact of DNA Testing for Early-Onset Familial Alzheimer Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia. Arch Neurol 58: 1828-1831 [Abstract] [Full Text]