What is the most sensitive non-invasive imaging strategy for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms?
P M Whitea b, E Teadsalea, J M Wardlawb, V Eastonc
a University
Department of Neurosurgery and Department of Neuroradiology, Institute
of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow G52
4TF, UK, b University of Edinburgh Department of Clinical
Neurosciences2, Bramwell Dott Building, Western General Hospital, Crewe
Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK, c University of Edinburgh Department of Medical
Statistics, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, UK
Correspondence to: Dr PM White pmw{at}skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk
Received 10 October
2000 and in revised form 26 February 2001;
Accepted 7
March 2001
OBJECTIVES
To
determine whether combining non-invasive tests for intracranial
aneurysms together would significantly improve aneurysm detection over
individual tests.
METHODS
114 patients
undergoing intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography to confirm or
exclude an intracranial aneurysm were also examined by CT angiography,
MR angiography, and transcranial power Doppler ultrasound. The
reviewers and ultrasonographers were blinded to the angiogram result,
other imaging results and all clinical information.
RESULTS
The
combination of non-invasive tests did improve diagnostic performance on
a per patient basis. The combination of power Doppler and CT
angiography had the greatest sensitivity for aneurysm detection (0.83;
05% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.66-0.93) and the level of
agreement for this strategy with the reference angiographic standard
was excellent (
0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.95). The improvement in
sensitivity of adding power Doppler to CT angiography was not significant (p=0.55) but the improvement in the level of agreement with
the reference standard was substantial. However, even the most
sensitive combination strategy performed poorly in the detection of
small (3-5 mm) and very small (<3 mm) aneurysms with a sensitivity of
0.43 (95% CI 0.23-0.66) and 0.00 (95% CI 0.00-0.31) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The
addition of transcranial power Doppler ultrasound to either CT
angiography or MR angiography does improve diagnostic performance on a
per patient basis but aneurysms of 5 mm or smaller can still not be
reliably identified by current standard clinical non-invasive imaging modalities.
Keywords: intracranial aneurysms; CT angiography; MR angiography; transcranial power Doppler
© 2001 by Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
Relevant Article
- What is the most sensitive non-invasive strategy for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms?
- PJ HUTCHINSON, PJ KIRKPATRICK
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2001 71: 289.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Jayaraman, M. V., Mayo-Smith, W. W., Tung, G. A., Haas, R. A., Rogg, J. M., Mehta, N. R., Doberstein, C. E.
(2004). Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms: Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography Compared with DSA. Radiology
230: 510-518
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
HUTCHINSON, P., KIRKPATRICK, P.
(2001). What is the most sensitive non-invasive strategy for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms?. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry
71: 289-289
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
