JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, G K C
Right arrow Articles by Lam, J M K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, G K C
Right arrow Articles by Lam, J M K
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2002;73:759-761
© 2002 Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry


SHORT REPORT

Failure of regular external ventricular drain exchange to reduce cerebrospinal fluid infection: result of a randomised controlled trial

G K C Wong1, W S Poon1, S Wai1, L M Yu3, D Lyon2, J M K Lam1

1 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 Department of Microbiology, Prince of Wales Hospital
3 Centre for Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Research, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr W S Poon, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong;
wpoon{at}cuhk.edu.hk


ABSTRACT
Background: It is controversial whether regular changes of external ventricular drains can reduce cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) infection.

Objective: To carry out a randomised controlled clinical trial over a two year period to determine whether a regular change of ventricular catheter every five days could reduce CSF infection and improve outcome.

Methods: 103 patients requiring external ventricular drains for more than five days and with no evidence of concurrent CSF infection were studied. The patients were randomised to regular change of ventricular catheter (every five days) and no change unless clinically indicated.

Results: The CSF infection rates were 7.8% for the catheter change group and 3.8% for the no change group, respectively (rate ratio = 1.80, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 9.81, p = 0.50). No significant difference was found in intensive care unit stay, ward stay, or clinical outcome between the two groups.

Conclusions: Regular changes of ventricular catheter at five day intervals did not reduce the risk of CSF infection. A single external ventricular drain can be employed for as long as clinically indicated.


Keywords: infection; external ventricular drain




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
I E Sandalcioglu, D Stolke, W S Poon, and G K C Wong
Failure of regular external ventricular drain exchange to reduce CSF infection * Authors' reply
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2003; 74(11): 1598 - 1599.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.