JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wade, D T
Right arrow Articles by Kaye, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wade, D T
Right arrow Articles by Kaye, J
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2003;74:158-162
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group


PAPER

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for people with Parkinson’s disease: a randomised controlled study

D T Wade1, H Gage2, C Owen3, P Trend4, C Grossmith5, J Kaye6

1 Oxford Centre for Enablement, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK
2 Department of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
3 Thomas Coram Research Unit, Institute of Education, London WC1, UK
4 Department of Neurology, Royal County Surrey Hospital, Guildford
5 Social Services Dept, Royal County Surrey Hospital
6 Specialist Nurse, Surrey Hampshire Borders NHS Trust, Guildford

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Derick T Wade, Oxford Centre for Enablement, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK;
derick.wade{at}dial.pipex.com

Objective: To determine whether a programme of multidisciplinary rehabilitation and group support achieves sustained benefit for people with Parkinson’s disease or their carers.

Methods: The study was a randomised controlled crossover trial comparing patients and carers who had received rehabilitation four months before assessment with those who had not. Patients were recruited from a neurology clinic, attended a day hospital from home weekly for six weeks using private car or hospital transport, and received group educational activities and individual rehabilitation from a multidisciplinary team. Patients were assessed at entry and at six months using a 25 item self assessment Parkinson’s disease disability questionnaire, Euroqol-5d, SF-36, PDQ-39, hospital anxiety and depression scale, and timed stand-walk-sit test. Carers were assessed using the carer strain index and Euroqol-5d.

Results: 144 people with Parkinson’s disease without severe cognitive losses and able to travel to hospital were registered (seven were duplicate registrations); 94 had assessments at baseline and six months. Repeated measures analysis of variance comparing patients at the 24 week crossover point showed that those receiving rehabilitation had a trend towards better stand-walk-sit score (p = 0.093) and worse general and mental health (p = 0.002, p = 0.019). Carers of treated patients had a trend towards more strain (p = 0.086). Analysis comparing patients before and six months after treatment showed worsening in disability, quality of life, and carer strain.

Conclusions: Patients with Parkinson’s disease decline significantly over six months, but a short spell of multidisciplinary rehabilitation may improve mobility. Follow up treatments may be needed to maintain any benefit.


Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; rehabilitation

Abbreviations: HAD, hospital anxiety and depression scale; NHPT, nine hole peg test; PDQ, Parkinson’s disease questionnaire; SF-36, short form 36 item health survey; UPDRS, unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale


Related Article

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for people with Parkinson’s disease
E D Playford
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2003 74: 148-149. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
P. Zinzi, D. Salmaso, R. De Grandis, G. Graziani, S. Maceroni, A. Bentivoglio, P. Zappata, M. Frontali, and G. Jacopini
Effects of an intensive rehabilitation programme on patients with Huntington's disease: a pilot study
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2007; 21(7): 603 - 613.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
C. Jenkinson, C. Heffernan, H. Doll, and R. Fitzpatrick
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): evidence for a method of imputing missing data
Age Ageing, September 1, 2006; 35(5): 497 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
O. Suchowersky, G. Gronseth, J. Perlmutter, S. Reich, T. Zesiewicz, and W. J. Weiner
Practice Parameter: neuroprotective strategies and alternative therapies for Parkinson disease (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.
Neurology, April 11, 2006; 66(7): 976 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
H. Gage, J. Kaye, C. Owen, P. Trend, and D. Wade
Evaluating rehabilitation using cost-consequences analysis: an example in Parkinson's disease
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2006; 20(3): 232 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
G Brichetto, E Pelosin, R Marchese, and G Abbruzzese
Evaluation of physical therapy in parkinsonian patients with freezing of gait: a pilot study
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2006; 20(1): 31 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A T Caglar, H N Gurses, F K Mutluay, and G Kiziltan
Effects of home exercises on motor performance in patients with Parkinson's disease
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2005; 19(8): 870 - 877.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. T Wade
Randomized clinical trials in Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2005; 19(3): 233 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
O. Suchowersky, G. Gronseth, J. Perlmutter, S. Reich, T. Zesiewicz, and W. J. Weiner
Practice Parameter: neuroprotective strategies and alternative therapies for Parkinson disease (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.
Neurology, April 11, 2006; 66(7): 976 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.