JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allder, S J
Right arrow Articles by Lennox, G G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allder, S J
Right arrow Articles by Lennox, G G
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2003;74:886-888
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group


PAPER

Differences in the diagnostic accuracy of acute stroke clinical subtypes defined by multimodal magnetic resonance imaging

S J Allder1, A R Moody2, A L Martel3, P S Morgan2, G S Delay2, J R Gladman4, G G Lennox1

1 University Department of Clinical Neurology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
2 Academic Radiology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham
3 Medical Physics, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham
4 Stroke Medicine and ADRU, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Steven J Allder, Department of Clinical Neurology, B floor, Medical School, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK;
steve{at}villaroad.freeserve.co.uk

Background: Despite its importance for acute stroke management, little is known about the underlying pathophysiology when patients with acute stroke are classified using clinical methods.

Objective: To examine the relation between the magnetic resonance defined stroke subtype and clinical stroke classifications using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), perfusion weighted imaging (PWI), and angiographic magnetic resonance techniques.

Methods: Consecutive patients with clinical syndromes consistent with acute anterior circulation stroke were assessed clinically within six hours of onset and scanned as soon as possible using multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients were classified clinically into total or partial anterior circulation syndromes using the Oxford classification, or according the severity of the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) (severe > 15; mild/moderate ≤ 15). At day seven, patients were classified by combining clinical course and MRI data as misdiagnosed, misclassified, suffering transient ischaemic attack, infarct with recanalisation, or infarction with persisting occlusion. Patients with occlusion were further divided on the basis of a large diffusion–perfusion mismatch.

Results: 84 patients with clinical anterior circulation syndromes were studied. Using the NIHSS, 42 were mild to moderate (0–15) and 42 were severe (> 15). There were 42 with partial anterior circulation syndromes (PACS) and 42 with total anterior circulation syndromes (TACS). Patients with TACS or severe stroke were more likely to have actually suffered a stroke (Fischer’s exact test, p = 0.01), to have a correctly classified stroke ({chi}2 28.2, p < 0.01), to have persisting occlusion ({chi}2 30.6, p < 0.01), and to have a large DWI–PWI mismatch ({chi}2 17.1, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: There is more inaccuracy in patients presenting with acute PACS or clinically mild to moderate anterior circulation stroke than in those with TACS or severe acute stroke syndromes. The latter appear more likely to be the targets for acute stroke interventions, as they include a significantly higher proportion of patients with persisting occlusion and diffusion/perfusion mismatch.


Keywords: multimodal MRI; penumbra; stroke


Relevant Article

Clinical radiologic correlations in acute stroke: is the signal intensity at the end of the tunnel getting brighter quicker?
D M Brown and S R Levine
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2003 74: 840-841. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J.M. Provenzale, K. Shah, U. Patel, and D.C. McCrory
Systematic Review of CT and MR Perfusion Imaging for Assessment of Acute Cerebrovascular Disease
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1476 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, J. Textor, J. Gieseke, M. von Falkenhausen, S. Gernert, H. Urbach, and H. H. Schild
Acute and Subacute Ischemic Stroke at High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Intraindividual Comparative Study
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C.J. S. Price, D.K. Menon, A.M. Peters, J.R. Ballinger, R.W. Barber, K.K. Balan, A. Lynch, J.H. Xuereb, T. Fryer, J.V. Guadagno, et al.
Cerebral Neutrophil Recruitment, Histology, and Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Imaging-Based Study
Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): 1659 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.