|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
PAPER |
1 Department of Neurosurgery, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
2 Department of Neurology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney
3 Department of Intensive Care, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney
4 Department of Neurosurgery, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Erhard W Lang, Department of Neurosurgery, Weimarer Strasse 8, D-24106 Kiel, Germany
Objectives: To validate this index and study its relation with cerebral blood flow velocity and cerebral autoregulation; and to identify variables associated with impairment or preservation of cerebral vasomotor reactivity.
Methods: The PRx was validated in a prospective study of 40 head injured patients. A PRx value of less than 0.3 indicates intact cerebral vasomotor reactivity, and a value of more than 0.3, impaired reactivity. Arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, mean cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebral blood flow velocity, measured bilaterally with transcranial Doppler ultrasound, were recorded. Dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation was measured using a moving correlation coefficient between arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity, the Mx, for each cerebral hemisphere. All variables were compared in patients with intact and impaired cerebral vasomotor reactivity.
Results: No correlation between arterial blood pressure or cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity was seen in 19 patients with intact cerebral vasomotor reactivity. In contrast, the correlation between these variables was significant in 21 patients with impaired cerebral vasomotor reactivity, whose cerebral autoregulation was reduced. There was no correlation with intracranial pressure, arterial blood pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, or interhemispheric cerebral autoregulation differences, but the values for these indices were largely within normal limits.
Conclusions: The PRx is valid for monitoring and quantifying cerebral vasomotor reactivity in patients with head injury. This intracranial pressure based index reflects changes in cerebral blood flow and cerebral autoregulatory capacity, suggesting a close link between blood flow and intracranial pressure in head injured patients. This explains why increases in arterial blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure may be useful for reducing intracranial pressure in selected head injured patients (those with intact cerebral vasomotor reactivity).
Keywords: cerebrovascular reactivity; cerebral autoregulation; intracranial pressure; head injury
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Haubrich, Z. Czosnyka, A. Lavinio, P. Smielewski, R. R. Diehl, J. D. Pickard, and M. Czosnyka Is There a Direct Link Between Cerebrovascular Activity and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure-Volume Compensation? Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): 2677 - 2680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B T Ang, J Wong, K K Lee, E Wang, and I Ng Temporal changes in cerebral tissue oxygenation with cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in severe traumatic brain injury J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2007; 78(3): 298 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. L. Cremer, G. W. van Dijk, G. J. Amelink, A. M. G. A. de Smet, K. G. M. Moons, and C. J. Kalkman Cerebral Hemodynamic Responses to Blood Pressure Manipulation in Severely Head-Injured Patients in the Presence or Absence of Intracranial Hypertension Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1211 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Marik Renal Dose Norepinephrine! Chest, August 1, 2004; 126(2): 335 - 337. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Soehle, M. Czosnyka, J. D. Pickard, and P. J. Kirkpatrick Continuous Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 1133 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |