JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balestreri, M
Right arrow Articles by Pickard, J D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balestreri, M
Right arrow Articles by Pickard, J D
Related Collections
Right arrow Critical Care / Intensive Care
Right arrow Head injury
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2004;75:161-162
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


SHORT REPORT

Predictive value of Glasgow coma scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years

M Balestreri1, M Czosnyka1,3, D A Chatfield2, L A Steiner1,2, E A Schmidt1, P Smielewski1, B Matta2, J D Pickard1

1 Academic Neurosurgical Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
3 Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M Czosnyka
Academic Neurosurgical Unit, Box 167, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK; mc141{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk


ABSTRACT
Background: Age and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission are considered important predictors of outcome after traumatic brain injury. We investigated the predictive value of the GCS in a large group of patients whose computerised multimodal bedside monitoring data had been collected over the previous 10 years.

Methods: Data from 358 subjects with head injury, collected between 1992 and 2001, were analysed retrospectively. Patients were grouped according to year of admission. Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) were determined at six months. Spearman’s correlation coefficients between GCS and GOS scores were calculated for each year.

Results: On average 34 (SD: 7) patients were monitored every year. We found a significant correlation between the GCS and GOS for the first five years (overall 1992–1996: r = 0.41; p<0.00001; n = 183) and consistent lack of correlations from 1997 onwards (overall 1997–2001: r = 0.091; p = 0.226; n = 175). In contrast, correlations between age and GOS were in both time periods significant and similar (r = -0.24 v r = -0.24; p<0.002).

Conclusions: The admission GCS lost its predictive value for outcome in this group of patients from 1997 onwards. The predictive value of the GCS should be carefully reconsidered when building prognostic models incorporating multimodality monitoring after head injury.


Keywords: Glasgow Coma Scale; head injury; coma

Abbreviations: GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Score; ICP, intracranial pressure; CPP, cerebral perfusion pressure; NCCU, Neurocritical Care Unit; ABP, arterial blood pressure




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
I. K. Moppett
Traumatic brain injury: assessment, resuscitation and early management
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2007; 99(1): 18 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other articles noted: 06 Feb 2004 to 16 Apr 2004
Evid. Based Nurs., July 1, 2004; 7(3): e3 - e3.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.