HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ruigrok, Y M Articles by van Gijn, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ruigrok, Y M Articles by van Gijn, J

Anticipation and phenotype in familial intracranial aneurysms

¹ Department of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
² Department of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Y M Ruigrok
Department of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO box 85500, 3500 GA Utrecht, Netherlands; ij.m.ruigrok{at}neuro.azu.nl

Background: In familial intracranial aneurysms there is evidence for genetic heterogeneity, probably from mutations at separate loci.

Objectives: To compare demographic and clinical features in patients of families with familial intracranial aneurysm and different patterns of inheritance; and to compare the ages of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) in affected parent–child pairs to determine whether there is anticipation.

Methods: Pedigrees for 53 families with familial intracranial aneurysms were constructed, divided into patterns of inheritance suggestive or not suggestive of autosomal dominant transmission. Demographic and clinical features were compared. The age at time of SAH in affected parent–child pairs was compared using the Wilcoxon test.

Results: No differences in demographic or clinical features were found between families compatible with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance and those with a non-dominant pattern. In families with affected members in two successive generations the age at time of SAH in parents was 55.2 years and in children 35.4 years (mean difference, 19.8 years, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Phenotypes are similar in families with and without a probable autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Thus in future genetic studies on familial intracranial aneurysms, stratification according to phenotype is not likely to be useful. Anticipation probably occurs, as affected parents are significantly older at the time of SAH than their affected children.

Keywords: aneurysm; genetics; subarachnoid haemorrhage

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. M. Ruigrok and G. J.E. Rinkel Genetics of Intracranial Aneurysms Stroke, March 1, 2008; 39(3): 1049 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J van Beijnum, H B van der Worp, H M Schippers, O van Nieuwenhuizen, L J Kappelle, G J E Rinkel, J W B. van der Sprenkel, and C J M Klijn Familial occurrence of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2007; 78(11): 1213 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Alberts and E. Tournier-Lasserve Update on the Genetics of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease 2004 Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 179 - 181. [Full Text] [PDF]