JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bakheit, A M O
Right arrow Articles by Coxon, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bakheit, A M O
Right arrow Articles by Coxon, L
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2004;75:1558-1561
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


PAPER

The beneficial antispasticity effect of botulinum toxin type A is maintained after repeated treatment cycles

A M O Bakheit1, N V Fedorova2, A A Skoromets3, S L Timerbaeva4, B B Bhakta5, L Coxon6

1 Professor of Neurological Rehabilitation, Peninsula Medical School & Plymouth Primary Care Trust, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth PL4 7QD, UK
2 Professor, Russian Medical Academy for Advanced Medical Studies, 5 Vtoroj Botinsky Projezd, Moscow 125101, Russia
3 Professor, Pavlov’s State Medical University, 6/8 L. Tolstoy street, St Petersburg 197022, Russia
4 Lead Researcher, Scientific Research Institute of Neurology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 80 Volokolamskoye Shosse, Moscow 123367, Russia
5 Senior Lecturer in Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Leeds & St James’s Hospital, Beckett St, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
6 Clinical Project Manager, Ipsen Ltd, 190 Bath Rd, Slough SL1 3XE, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor A M O Bakheit
Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth PL4 7QD, UK; magid.bakheit{at}pcs-tr.swest.nhs.uk

Objective: To study the efficacy, safety, and incidence of BtxA antibody formation with repeated treatments with BtxA in post-stroke upper limb muscle spasticity.

Methods: The study was a prospective open label trial. Patients with established post-stroke upper limb spasticity received 1000 units of BtxA (Dysport) into five muscles of the affected arm on study entry. Treatment was repeated every 12, 16, or 20 weeks as clinically indicated. Each patient received a total of three treatment cycles. Efficacy of treatment was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Patients were assessed on study entry and on week 4 and 12 of each treatment cycle for all safety and efficacy parameters. Blood samples for BtxA antibody assay were taken at baseline and on completion of the trial.

Results: Fifty one patients were recruited and 41 of them completed the study. Improvement from the cycle one baseline was observed in all the outcome measures. Mild to moderately severe treatment related adverse events were reported in 24% of cases. There were no serious adverse events. No BtxA antibodies were detected.

Conclusion: BtxA at a dose of 1000 units Dysport was efficacious in the symptomatic treatment of post-stroke upper limb spasticity. The study suggests that this effect can be maintained with repeated injections for up to at least three treatment cycles, with duration of effect per cycle of between 12 and 20 weeks. BtxA was safe in the dose used in this study and did not induce the formation of detectable levels of neutralising BtxA antibodies.


Abbreviations: BtxA, botulinum toxin type A; MAS, Modified Ashworth Scale; PD & CBRS, Patients’ Disability and Carer Burden Rating scale; RCT, randomised controlled trials; ROM, range of motion

Keywords: botulinum toxin; spasticity; stroke; botulinum toxin antibodies




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. M. Simpson, J-M Gracies, H. K. Graham, J. M. Miyasaki, M. Naumann, B. Russman, L. L. Simpson, and Y. So
Assessment: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of spasticity (an evidence-based review): Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Neurology, May 6, 2008; 70(19): 1691 - 1698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
S. Ozcakir and K. Sivrioglu
Botulinum Toxin in Poststroke Spasticity
Clin. Med. Res., June 1, 2007; 5(2): 132 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.