Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2004;75:241-245; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2003.015826
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2004;75:241-245
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

PAPER

Interrater agreement of the diagnosis and classification of a first seizure in childhood. The Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood

H Stroink1, C A van Donselaar2, A T Geerts3, A C B Peters4, O F Brouwer5, O van Nieuwenhuizen4, R F M de Coo3, H Geesink6, W F M Arts3

1 Department of Neurology, St Elisabeth Hospital and TweeSteden Hospital, the Netherlands
2 Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Epilepsy Section, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
3 Department of Paediatric Neurology, Erasmus Medical Centre/Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
4 Department of Paediatric Neurology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
5 Department of Paediatric Neurology, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
6 Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen, Heemstede, the Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
H Stroink
Department of Neurology, St Elisabeth Hospital, PO Box 90151, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands; H.Stroink{at}Elisabeth.nl

Objective: To assess the interrater agreement of the diagnosis and the classification of a first paroxysmal event in childhood.

Methods: The descriptions of 100 first paroxysmal events were submitted to two panels each consisting of three experienced paediatric neurologists. Each observer independently made a diagnosis based on clinical judgment and thereafter a diagnosis based on predefined descriptive criteria. Then, the observers discussed all patients within their panel. The agreement between the six individual observers was assessed before discussion within each panel and after that, between the two panels.

Results: Using their clinical judgement, the individual observers reached only fair to moderate agreement on the diagnosis of a first seizure (mean (SE) kappa 0.41 (0.03)). With use of defined descriptive criteria the mean (SE) kappa was 0.45 (0.03). The kappa for agreement between both panels after intra-panel discussion increased to 0.60 (0.06). The mean (SE) kappa for the seizure classification by individual observers was 0.46 (0.02) for clinical judgment and 0.57 (0.03) with use of criteria. After discussion within each panel the kappa between the panels was 0.69 (0.06). In 24 out of 51 children considered to have had a seizure, agreement was reached between the panels on a syndrome diagnosis. However, the epileptic syndromes were in most cases only broadly defined.

Conclusions: The interrater agreement on the diagnosis of a first seizure in childhood is just moderate. This phenomenon hampers the interpretation of studies on first seizures in which the diagnosis is only made by one observer. The use of a panel increased the interrater agreement considerably. This approach is recommended at least for research purposes. Classification into clinically relevant syndromes is possible only in a very small minority of children with a single seizure.

Keywords: reliability; diagnosis; first seizure

Abbreviations: DSEC, Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood; ILAE, International League Against Epilepsy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Leung, H, Man, C Y, Hui, A C F, Wong, K S, Kwan, P (2008). Agreement between initial and final diagnosis of first seizures, epilepsy and non-epileptic events: a prospective study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 79: 1144-1147 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stephenson, J. B. P. (2007). Clinical Diagnosis of Syncopes (Including So-called Breath-Holding Spells) Without Electroencephalography or Ocular Compression. J Child Neurol 22: 502-508 [Abstract]  
  • Beach, R, Reading, R (2005). The importance of acknowledging clinical uncertainty in the diagnosis of epilepsy and non-epileptic events. Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 1219-1222 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Oostrom, K. J., van Teeseling, H., Smeets-Schouten, A., Peters, A. C. B., Jennekens-Schinkel, A., on behalf of the Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childh, (2005). Three to four years after diagnosis: cognition and behaviour in children with 'epilepsy only'. A prospective, controlled study. Brain 128: 1546-1555 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • (2004). Lucina. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 798-798 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs

Neurology and neurosurgery jobs