HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stroink, H Articles by Arts, W F M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stroink, H Articles by Arts, W F M

Interrater agreement of the diagnosis and classification of a first seizure in childhood. The Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood

¹ Department of Neurology, St Elisabeth Hospital and TweeSteden Hospital, the Netherlands
² Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Epilepsy Section, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
³ Department of Paediatric Neurology, Erasmus Medical Centre/Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
⁴ Department of Paediatric Neurology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
⁵ Department of Paediatric Neurology, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
⁶ Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen, Heemstede, the Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
H Stroink
Department of Neurology, St Elisabeth Hospital, PO Box 90151, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands; H.Stroink{at}Elisabeth.nl

Methods: The descriptions of 100 first paroxysmal events were submitted to two panels each consisting of three experienced paediatric neurologists. Each observer independently made a diagnosis based on clinical judgment and thereafter a diagnosis based on predefined descriptive criteria. Then, the observers discussed all patients within their panel. The agreement between the six individual observers was assessed before discussion within each panel and after that, between the two panels.

Results: Using their clinical judgement, the individual observers reached only fair to moderate agreement on the diagnosis of a first seizure (mean (SE) kappa 0.41 (0.03)). With use of defined descriptive criteria the mean (SE) kappa was 0.45 (0.03). The kappa for agreement between both panels after intra-panel discussion increased to 0.60 (0.06). The mean (SE) kappa for the seizure classification by individual observers was 0.46 (0.02) for clinical judgment and 0.57 (0.03) with use of criteria. After discussion within each panel the kappa between the panels was 0.69 (0.06). In 24 out of 51 children considered to have had a seizure, agreement was reached between the panels on a syndrome diagnosis. However, the epileptic syndromes were in most cases only broadly defined.

Conclusions: The interrater agreement on the diagnosis of a first seizure in childhood is just moderate. This phenomenon hampers the interpretation of studies on first seizures in which the diagnosis is only made by one observer. The use of a panel increased the interrater agreement considerably. This approach is recommended at least for research purposes. Classification into clinically relevant syndromes is possible only in a very small minority of children with a single seizure.

Keywords: reliability; diagnosis; first seizure

Abbreviations: DSEC, Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood; ILAE, International League Against Epilepsy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H Leung, C Y Man, A C F Hui, K S Wong, and P Kwan Agreement between initial and final diagnosis of first seizures, epilepsy and non-epileptic events: a prospective study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2008; 79(10): 1144 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. P. Stephenson Clinical Diagnosis of Syncopes (Including So-called Breath-Holding Spells) Without Electroencephalography or Ocular Compression J Child Neurol, April 1, 2007; 22(4): 502 - 508. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R Beach and R Reading The importance of acknowledging clinical uncertainty in the diagnosis of epilepsy and non-epileptic events Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2005; 90(12): 1219 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Oostrom, H. van Teeseling, A. Smeets-Schouten, A. C. B. Peters, A. Jennekens-Schinkel, and on behalf of the Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childh Three to four years after diagnosis: cognition and behaviour in children with 'epilepsy only'. A prospective, controlled study Brain, July 1, 2005; 128(7): 1546 - 1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Lucina Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2004; 89(8): 798 - 798. [Full Text] [PDF]