JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyu, R K
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Y R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyu, R K
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Y R
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2004;75:256-261
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


PAPER

The use of evoked potentials for clinical correlation and surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with intramedullary high signal intensity on MRI

R K Lyu1, L M Tang1, C J Chen2, C M Chen1, H S Chang1, Y R Wu1

1 Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University, Taipei, Taiwan
2 Second Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University, Taipei, Taiwan

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
R K Lyu
Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 199, Tung Hwa North Road, Taipei, Taiwan; lyu5172{at}adm.cgmh.org.tw

Objective: To investigate the use of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) for clinical significance and surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with intramedullary high signal intensity on T2 weighted MRI.

Methods: Forty nine patients were scored according to the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for cervical myelopathy. MEP and SEP studies were performed and the results were categorised as normal or abnormal. Thirty nine patients who had received surgical decompression were re-evaluated after 6 months. Surgical outcome was represented by the recovery ratio of the JOA score.

Results: Abnormal MEPs were observed in 44 patients (arm: 43; leg: 30). Abnormal SEPs were found in 32 patients: (median: 24; tibial: 23). Patients with abnormal SEPs had a worse JOA score than those with normal SEPs. Thirty nine patients received surgical treatment. Patients younger than 55 had better recovery ratios than those who were 55 or older (p = 0.005, two sample Student’s t test). Patients with normal median SEPs also had better recovery ratios than those with abnormal median SEPs (p = 0.007, two sample Student’s t test). Among median SEP variables, only N9-20 was significantly associated with recovery ratio (p = 0.016, stepwise linear regression), with age factor controlled (p = 0.025, stepwise linear regression).

Conclusion: Arm MEP was the most sensitive EP test for detecting myelopathy in patients with chronic CSM. Median and tibial SEPs correlated well with the severity of myelopathy while normal median SEPs correlated with good surgical outcome. Among median SEP variables, only N9-20 correlated with surgical outcome.


Keywords: cervical spondylotic myelopathy; intramedullary high signal intensity; motor evoked potentials; prognostic factors; somatosensory evoked potentials

Abbreviations: APB, abductor pollicis brevis muscles; CMCT, central motor conduction time; CSM, cervical spondylotic myelopathy; CT, computed tomography; IPL, interpeak latency; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; MEP, motor evoked potential; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SEP, somatosensory evoked potential; TA, tibialis anterior muscles




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. D. Rao, B. L. Currier, T. J. Albert, C. M. Bono, S. V. Marawar, K. A. Poelstra, and J. C. Eck
Degenerative cervical spondylosis: clinical syndromes, pathogenesis, and management.
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2007; 89(6): 1360 - 1378.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.