HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Patterson, V Articles by Chua, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Patterson, V Articles by Chua, R

Email triage of new neurological outpatient referrals from general practice

¹ Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
² Erne Hospital, Enniskillen, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr V Patterson
Department of Neurology, Neurology Ward 4E, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK; tele.neuro{at}royalhospitals.n-i.nhs.uk

Objectives: To determine whether an email triage system between general practitioners and a neurologist for new outpatient referrals is feasible, acceptable, efficient, safe, and effective.

Methods: This was a prospective single cohort study on the interface between primary care practitioners and the neurology clinic of a district general hospital. Seventy six consecutive patients with neurological symptoms from nine GPs, for whom a specialist opinion was deemed necessary, were entered in the study. The number of participants managed without clinic attendance and the reduction in neurologist’s time compared with conventional consultation was measured, as was death, other specialist referral, and change in diagnosis in the 6 months after episode completion. The acceptability for GPs was ascertained by questionnaire.

Results: Forty three per cent of participants required a clinic appointment, 45% were managed by email advice alone, and 12% by email plus investigations. GP satisfaction was high. Forty four per cent of the neurologist’s time was saved compared with conventional consultation. No deaths or significant changes in diagnosis were recorded during the 6 month follow up period.

Conclusions: Email triage is feasible, acceptable to GPs, and safe. It has the potential for making the practice of neurologists more efficient, and this needs to be tested in a larger randomised study.

Keywords: email; health services research; teleneurology

Abbreviations: GP, general practitioner; UPCI, unique patient client identifier

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V Patterson, C Donaghy, and L Loizou Email triage for new neurological outpatient referrals: what the customers think. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2006; 77(11): 1295 - 1296. [Full Text] [PDF]