Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2005;76:684-690; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.041434
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2005;76:684-690
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

PAPER

Bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation: midline tremor control

J D Putzke1, R J Uitti1, A A Obwegeser2,*, Z K Wszolek1 and R E Wharen2

1 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Florida, USA
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R J Uitti
Department of Neurology, Davis Bldg E-8, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA; uitti{at}mayo.edu

Objectives: To determine the efficacy of bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) for management of midline tremor (head, voice, tongue, trunk) in patients with essential tremor.

Design: Prospective assessment of tremor at baseline (presurgical), and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 12 months, and annually thereafter.

Methods: A clinical series of 22 individuals undergoing staged, bilateral DBS for treatment of essential tremor. The tremor rating scale was the primary outcome measure.

Results: Midline tremor showed significant improvement with stimulation "on" at nearly every postoperative interval when compared with stimulation "off" and with baseline tremor. Bilateral stimulation was associated with a significant incremental improvement in midline tremor control compared with unilateral stimulation: average "stimulation on" percentage change in midline tremor from the unilateral to bilateral period was 81%. Head and voice tremor showed the most consistent improvement. Among those requiring a change in stimulation parameters because of side effects, dysarthria, disequilibrium, motor disturbances, and paraesthesiae were the most common. Dysarthria was more common with bilateral (n = 6; 27%) than with unilateral (n = 0) stimulation. Stimulation parameters remained largely unchanged after the first three months. Nine of 44 leads placed (20%) required subsequent repositioning or replacement.

Conclusions: Unilateral thalamic stimulation significantly improves midline tremor, and subsequent bilateral thalamic stimulation offers an additional incremental improvement in midline tremor control.

Abbreviations: DBS, deep brain stimulation; IPG, implantable pulse generator; TRS, tremor rating scale; Vim, ventral intermediate (nucleus)

Keywords: deep brain stimulation; essential tremor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Laterality of motor control in deep brain stimulation
iraj derakhshan, md
JNNP Online, 6 Mar 2006 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs

Neurology and neurosurgery jobs