HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bang, O Y Articles by Huh, K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bang, O Y Articles by Huh, K Related Collections Other Cardiovascular Medicine Stroke

Inflammatory markers, rather than conventional risk factors, are different between carotid and MCA atherosclerosis

¹ Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
² Department of Neuroradiology, Shin Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Oh Young Bang
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Ajou University, Woncheon-dong San 5, Paldal-ku, Suwon, Kyungki-do, 442-749, Republic of Korea; nmboy{at}unitel.co.kr

Background: The apparent differences in risk factors for intra- and extracranial atherosclerosis are unclear and the mechanisms that underlie strokes in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis are not well known. We investigated the conventional vascular risk factors as well as other factors in stroke patients with large artery atherosclerosis.

Methods: Using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and vascular and cardiologic studies, we selected patients with acute non-cardioembolic cerebral infarcts within the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory. Patients were divided into two groups: those with atherosclerotic lesions on the carotid sinus (n = 112) and those with isolated lesions on the proximal MCA (n = 160). Clinical features, risk factors, and DWI patterns were compared between groups.

Results: There were no differences in conventional risk factors, but markers for inflammation were significantly higher in patients with carotid atherosclerosis than in those with isolated MCA atherosclerosis (p<0.01 for both). After adjustments for age/sex and the severity of stroke, an inverse correlation was observed between C-reactive protein levels and MCA atherosclerosis (odds ratio 0.57 per 1 mg/dl increase; 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.92; p = 0.02). Internal borderzone infarcts suggestive of haemodynamic causes were the most frequent DWI pattern in patients with MCA occlusion, whereas territorial infarcts suggesting plaque ruptures were most common in those with carotid occlusion.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that inflammatory markers, rather than conventional risk factors, reveal clinical and radiological differences between patients with carotid and MCA atherosclerosis. Plaques associated with MCA atherosclerosis may be more stable than those associated with carotid atherosclerosis.

Abbreviations: CAOD, coronary artery occlusive disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; DWI, diffusion weighted imaging; ICA, internal carotid artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MMP-9, matrix metalloproteinase-9; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

Keywords: atherosclerosis; carotid stenosis; intracranial stenosis; ischemic stroke; risk factors