|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
SHORT REPORT |
1 Academic Department of Neurology, University of Birmingham and Department of Neurology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
2 Department of Neurology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
3 Department of Statistics, Institute of Child Health, University of Birmingham
4 Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr C E Clarke
Department of Neurology, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK; c.e.clarke{at}bham.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the ability of a headache nurse specialist and consultant neurologists in diagnosing tension-type headache and migraine.
Methods: An experienced neurology ward sister was trained in the differential diagnosis of headache disorders. Over six months, patients with non-acute headache disorders and role players trained to present with benign or sinister headaches were seen by both the nurse and a consultant neurologist. Both reached independent diagnoses of various headache disorders.
Results: Consultants diagnosed 239 patients with tension-type headache (47%), migraine (39%), or other headache disorders (14%). The nurse agreed with the consultant in 92% of cases of tension-type headache, 91% of migraine, and 61% of other diagnoses. Where the nurse did not agree with the diagnosis, most would have been referred for a consultant opinion. Both the nurse and the doctors misdiagnosed the same three of 13 role players. The investigation rate of the consultants varied between 18% and 59%. Only one clinically relevant abnormality was found on head scans and this was strongly suspected clinically.
Conclusions: A headache nurse specialist can be trained to diagnose tension-type headache and migraine. A nationwide nurse led diagnostic headache service could lead to substantial reduction in neurology waiting times.
Keywords: clinical nurse specialist; headache
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Marcovitch What's new this month in BMJ Journals BMJ, September 10, 2005; 331(7516): 540 - 540. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |