JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 13 June 2006. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.090183
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2006;77:1129-1135
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnnp.2006.090183v1
77/10/1129    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradshaw, J M
Right arrow Articles by Brodtmann, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradshaw, J M
Right arrow Articles by Brodtmann, A

PAPER

Higher cortical deficits influence attentional processing in dementia with Lewy bodies, relative to patients with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type and controls

J M Bradshaw1, M Saling1, V Anderson2, M Hopwood1, A Brodtmann1

1 Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
2 Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
J M Bradshaw
Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia;jbrad{at}unimelb.edu.au

Background: Attentional dysfunction is believed to be a prominent and distinguishing neuropsychological feature of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB); yet, the specific nature of the attentional deficit and factors that can potentially influence attentional processing in DLB have not been fully defined.

Aims: To clarify the nature of the attentional deficit in early-stage DLB relative to patients with early-stage dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (DAT) and elderly controls, and examine the effect of task complexity and type of cognitive load on attentional processing in DLB.

Methods: Attentional impairment and fluctuating attention were investigated in three groups of subjects—patients with clinical features of early probable DLB (n = 20), a group with early probable DAT (n = 19) and healthy elderly controls (n = 20)—using an experimental computerised reaction time paradigm.

Results: Patients with DLB showed greater attentional impairment and fluctuations in attention relative to patients with DAT and elderly controls. The attentional deficit was generalised in nature but increased in magnitude as greater demands were placed on attentional selectivity. Attentional deficits in DLB were most pronounced under task conditions that required more active recruitment of executive control and visuospatial cognitive processes.

Conclusions: Attentional deficits in DLB are widespread and encompass all aspects of attentional function. Deficits in higher cortical function influence the degree of attentional impairment and fluctuating attention, suggesting that attentional processing in DLB is mediated by interacting cortical and subcortical mechanisms. These findings serve to clarify the nature of the attentional deficit in DLB and have potentially important ramifications for our understanding of the neurocognitive underpinnings of fluctuations.


Abbreviations: CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating; DAT, dementia of the Alzheimer’s type; DLB, dementia associated with Lewy bodies; ISI, interstimulus interval; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; NART, National Adult Reading Test; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
J. A. Levy and G. J. Chelune
Cognitive-Behavioral Profiles of Neurodegenerative Dementias: Beyond Alzheimer's Disease
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, December 1, 2007; 20(4): 227 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.