JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 30 March 2006. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.074989
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2006;77:841-849
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnnp.2005.074989v1
77/7/841    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tate, R L
Right arrow Articles by Hanna, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tate, R L
Right arrow Articles by Hanna, J

PAPER

A multicentre, randomised trial examining the effect of test procedures measuring emergence from post-traumatic amnesia

R L Tate1, A Pfaff2, I J Baguley3, J E Marosszeky3, J A Gurka3, A E Hodgkinson2, C King4, A T Lane-Brown1, J Hanna1

1 Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
2 Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney
3 Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Westmead Hospital, Sydney
4 Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Sydney

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Robyn Tate
Rehabilitation Studies Unit, PO Box 6, RYDE NSW 1680, Australia; rtate{at}med.usyd.edu.au

Background: Post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) tests that record different PTA durations in the same patient, thereby raising measurement accuracy issues, have been reported previously. A major problem lies in determining the end point of PTA.

Aims: To delineate areas of discrepancy in PTA tests and to provide independent verification for a criterion signalling emergence from PTA.

Methods: In a randomised design, two related PTA procedures were compared, one purportedly more difficult (Westmead PTA Scale, WPTAS) than the other (Modified Oxford PTA Scale, MOPTAS). Eighty two patients in the early stages of PTA were examined daily until emergence, by using the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and the WPTAS/MOPTAS. A short battery of cognitive and behavioural measurements was made on three occasions: at the early stage of PTA (time 1), towards the end of PTA when the maximum score (12/12) was first obtained (time 2) and at the traditional criterion for emergence (scoring 12/12 for 3 consecutive days; time 3).

Results: No significant difference was recorded in PTA duration between the MOPTAS and WPTAS. Both scales recorded longer PTA durations than the GOAT. By using Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, the WPTAS was found to show a more protracted pattern of emergence at the end stage of PTA than the MOPTAS. A time lag of >=1 week in the resolution of disorientation as compared with amnesia was observed in 59% cases. Significant improvements occurred on all independent measurements between time 1 and time 2, but on only 2 of 5 cognitive measurements between time 2 and time 3.

Conclusions: Although no significant differences in the duration of PTA on the MOPTAS/WPTAS were recorded, emergence from the late stages of PTA occurred more promptly with the MOPTAS. The need for inclusion of both orientation and memory items in PTA tests is highlighted by the frequency of disorientation–amnesia dissociations. The patterns of results on the independent measures suggest that patients who are in PTA for > 4 weeks have probably emerged from PTA when they first score 12/12 on the MOPTAS/WPTAS, and this criterion can replace the traditional criterion.


Abbreviations: ABS, Agitated Behavior Scale; ARLT, "A" Random Letter Test; CALCAP, California Computerized Assessment Package; GOAT, Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test; MMSE, Mini-Mental Status Examination; MOPTAS, Modified Oxford PTA Scale; PTA, post-traumatic amnesia; VerbalSR, Verbal Selective Reminding Test; VisualSR, Visual Selective Reminding subtest; WPTAS, Westmead PTA Scale




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
E A Shores, A Lammel, C Hullick, J Sheedy, M Flynn, W Levick, and J Batchelor
The diagnostic accuracy of the Revised Westmead PTA Scale as an adjunct to the Glasgow Coma Scale in the early identification of cognitive impairment in patients with mild traumatic brain injury
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2008; 79(10): 1100 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
R. Nakase-Richardson, S. A Yablon, and M. Sherer
Prospective comparison of acute confusion severity with duration of post-traumatic amnesia in predicting employment outcome after traumatic brain injury
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 78(8): 872 - 876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.