SHORT REPORT

Illness perceptions and outcome in mild head injury: a longitudinal study

Robert Whittaker¹, Steven Kemp² and Allan House³

¹ Department of Clinical Health Psychology, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, St Luke’s Hospital, Bradford, UK
² St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
³ Institute of Health Sciences and Public Health Research, Head, Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Robert Whittaker
Department of Clinical Health Psychology, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, St Luke’s Hospital, Little Horton Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD5 0NA, UK; robert.whittaker{at}bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk

Background: A range of neuropathological and psychosocial factors have been implicated in the aetiology and maintenance of post-concussional syndrome (PCS), with a growing consensus in the literature that this is a complex, multifactorial condition. The role of patients’ perceptions in PCS has not been examined to date.

Objective: This longitudinal study examines the role of illness perceptions in predicting outcome following mild head injury, controlling for severity of injury, post-traumatic stress symptoms, anxiety and depression, using a logistic regression analysis.

Method: 73 patients were admitted to an accident and emergency department with mild head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score 13–15; loss of consciousness <20 min; post-traumatic amnesia <24 h). Data on PCS symptomatology, illness perceptions, post-traumatic stress symptoms, anxiety and depression were collected after the injury and at the 3 month follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of outcome.

Results: Following a mild head injury, symptomatic patients who believe that their symptoms have serious negative consequences on their lives and will continue to do so, are at heightened risk of experiencing significant enduring post-concussional symptoms (p<0.001). Adding measures of severity of injury, post-traumatic stress symptoms, anxiety and depression to the regression model did not improve prediction of outcome.

Conclusion: Whatever other physical or psychological factors may be involved, patients’ perceptions of their illness early after head injury play a part in the persistence of PCS.

Abbreviations: HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; IES, Impact of Event Scale; IPQ-R, Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised; PCS, post-concussional syndrome; RPQ, Rivermead Post-concussion Questionnaire

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Post concussional syndrome: all in the minds eye!

Rodger L Wood
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007 78: 552. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Jones, E., Fear, N. T., Wessely, S. (2007). Shell Shock and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Historical Review. Am. J. Psychiatry 164: 1641-1645 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2007). Postconcussion Syndrome: It Happens When You Think It's Going to Be Bad. JWatch Psychiatry 2007: 2-2 [Full Text]  
• Allen, E. A (2007). Interventions for postconcussion syndrome. Trauma 9: 181-187 [Abstract]  
• Wood, R. L (2007). Post concussional syndrome: all in the minds eye!. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 78: 552-552 [Full Text]  
• Carr, J. (2007). Postconcussion syndrome: a review. Trauma 9: 21-27 [Abstract]