Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 25 January 2008. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.132571
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2008;79:1100-1106
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

RESEARCH PAPERS

The diagnostic accuracy of the Revised Westmead PTA Scale as an adjunct to the Glasgow Coma Scale in the early identification of cognitive impairment in patients with mild traumatic brain injury

E A Shores1, A Lammél1, C Hullick2, J Sheedy3, M Flynn4, W Levick2, J Batchelor1

1 Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
2 Division of Emergency Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton, Australia
3 Trauma Service, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
4 Ambulance Service NSW, Sydney, Australia

Dr E A Shores, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, 2109, Australia; ashores{at}psy.mq.edu.au

Background: Assessment of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is predominantly done using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). While the GCS is universally accepted for assessment of severity of traumatic brain injury, it may not be appropriate to rely on the GCS alone when assessing patients with mTBI in prehospital settings and emergency departments.

Objective: To determine whether administering the Revised Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia (PTA) Scale (R-WPTAS) in addition to the GCS would increase diagnostic accuracy in the early identification of cognitive impairment in patients with mTBI.

Methods: Data were collected from 82 consecutive participants with mTBI who presented to the emergency department of a level 1 trauma centre in Australia. A matched sample of 88 control participants who attended the emergency department for reasons other than head trauma was also assessed. All patients were assessed using the GCS, R-WPTAS and a battery of neuropsychological tests.

Results: Patients with mTBI scored poorly compared with control patients on all measures. The R-WPTAS showed greater concurrent validity with the neuropsychological measures than the GCS and significantly increased prediction of group membership of patients with mTBI with cognitive impairment.

Conclusions: The R-WPTAS significantly improves diagnostic accuracy in identifying patients with mTBI who may be in PTA. Administration takes less than 1 min, and since early identification of a patient’s cognitive status facilitates management decisions, it is recommended for routine use whenever the GCS is used.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs

Neurology and neurosurgery jobs