JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 5 June 2007. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.118489
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2008;79:418-420
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow web only table
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnnp.2007.118489v1
79/4/418    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seok, J I
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K J
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seok, J I
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K J

RESEARCH PAPERS

The usefulness of clinical findings in localising lesions in Bell’s palsy: comparison with MRI

J I Seok, D-K Lee, K J Kim

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea

Correspondence to:
Dong-Kuck Lee, MD, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, 3056-6 Daemyeong 4 Dong, Nam-Gu, Daegu 705-718, Korea; dklee{at}cu.ac.kr

Background: Although electrophysiological tests and brain MRI provide information about the site of the lesion in Bell’s palsy, clinicians usually depend on clinical data. However, the accuracy of clinical findings in identifying lesions has never been evaluated.

Method: A total of 57 patients with idiopathic peripheral facial palsy were included in this study. We determined the sites of the lesions based on associated symptoms and by brain MRI. We then compared the two to assess the value of clinical findings in determining lesion sites.

Results: Of the 57 patients, 27 were men. The mean age of all patients was 50.6±16.7 years. The lesion sites determined from clinical findings were as follows: the infrageniculate-suprastapedial segment, 13 (23%); the infrastapedial-suprachordal segment, 9 (16%); and the mastoid segment, 35 (61%). No sites were classified as involving the suprageniculate segment. On brain MRI, 51 (89%) of the 57 patients showed abnormal enhancement of the facial nerve, with the most common area being the suprageniculate segment, including the distal intrameatal, labyrinthine and geniculate ganglion.

Conclusions: We demonstrate that clinical history is not helpful in determining the site of a lesion in Bell’s palsy. The segment most frequently involved in Bell’s palsy is the suprageniculate segment.


Keywords: Bell’s palsy; localisation; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.