JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 17 July 2007. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.122879
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2008;79:553-558
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnnp.2007.122879v1
79/5/553    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Kooten, F
Right arrow Articles by Dippel, D W J
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Kooten, F
Right arrow Articles by Dippel, D W J

RESEARCH PAPERS

Epidural blood patch in post dural puncture headache: a randomised, observer-blind, controlled clinical trial

F van Kooten1, R Oedit2, S L M Bakker3, D W J Dippel1

1 Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Neurology, Ruwaard van Putten General Hospital, Spijkenisse, The Netherlands
3 Department of Neurology, St Franciscus General Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Dr F van Kooten, Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; f.vankooten{at}erasmusmc.nl

Objectives: To determine the efficacy of epidural blood patch (EDBP) for the treatment of post dural puncture headache (PDPH).

Methods: We randomised 42 patients who presented with PDPH, lasting 24 h to 1 week, to receive EDBP (n = 19) or conservative treatment (n = 23). The primary end point was any headache at 24 h after the start of treatment. Secondary end points were presence and severity of headache after 1 week. Stratified Mantel–Haenzel analysis was used to adjust for confounders.

Results: Two patients refused to participate directly after randomisation and allocation to conservative treatment. They were excluded from the study. At 24 h after the start of treatment, headache was present in 11 (58%) patients allocated to EDBP and in 19 (90%) patients allocated to conservative treatment (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.96). At day 7, headache was present in three (16%) patients allocated to EDBP and in 18 (86%) allocated to conservative treatment (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.53). Headache was mild in all three EDBP patients, but in 10 of 18 conservatively treated patients who had not recovered by day 7 it was classified as moderate or severe. Adjustments for confounders did not affect these results.

Conclusions: EDBP is an effective treatment for PDPH. It offers complete resolution of symptoms in a large proportion of patients. In the remaining patients, it reduces headache severity and allows them to return to their everyday activities.





eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Historical corrections to van Kooten at al.
Brian E Harrington
JNNP Online, 11 Jun 2008 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.