HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jnnp.2007.121582v1 79/5/574    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Yang, S-Y Articles by Jung, H-W PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yang, S-Y Articles by Jung, H-W

Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: prognostic implications of clinicopathological features

¹ Department of Neurosurgery, DongGuk University International Hospital, Goyang, Korea
² Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
³ Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
⁴ Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to:
Young Seob Chung, MD, PhD, Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongeon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110–744, Republic of Korea; yschung{at}snu.ac.kr

Methods: Between 1986 and 2004, 74 patients were diagnosed with high-grade meningioma: 33 with atypical and 41 with anaplastic meningioma. The mean follow-up was 58.5 months. We reclassified all surgical specimens, according to the 2000 WHO classification system, using two expert neuropathologists.

Results: Forty of 74 meningiomas were reclassified as atypical meningioma and 24 as anaplastic meningioma. Overall and recurrence-free survivals were significantly longer in patients with atypical than in those with anaplastic meningioma: 142.5 versus 39.8 months and 138.5 versus 32.2 months, respectively (p<0.001). In patients with atypical meningiomas, brain invasion and adjuvant radiotherapy were not associated with survival; however, in the brain invasion subgroup, adjuvant radiotherapy improved patients’ survival. In patients with anaplastic meningioma, the prognostic factors were brain invasion, adjuvant radiotherapy, malignant progression, p53 overexpression and extent of resection. The p53 overexpression was the only factor associated with malignant progression (p = 0.009).

Conclusions: The 2000 WHO classification has identified the truly aggressive meningiomas better than did the previous criteria. A precise meningioma grading system may help to avoid over-treatment of patients with an atypical meningioma as, once the tumour has "declared itself" by recurrence and histological features, it becomes a tumour that is poorly amenable to current therapies.