JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 8 November 2007. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.132811
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2008;79:808-812
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v79,p1086)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnnp.2007.132811v1
79/7/808    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liimatainen, S P
Right arrow Articles by Peltola, J T
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liimatainen, S P
Right arrow Articles by Peltola, J T

RESEARCH PAPERS

The benefit of active drug trials is dependent on aetiology in refractory focal epilepsy

S P Liimatainen1, J A Raitanen2, A M Ylinen1, M A Peltola1, J T Peltola1

1 Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland
2 Tampere School of Public Health, 33014 University of Tampere, Finland

Correspondence to:
Dr Suvi Liimatainen, Hirvenkellontie 7 A 1, 37560 Lempäälä, Finland; suvi.liimatainen{at}fimnet.fi

Background: Earlier studies have shown that aetiology makes a difference in the outcome of epilepsy, but there is a paucity of follow-up studies to evaluate the possibilities of achieving seizure freedom in initially refractory epilepsy.

Methods: We evaluated the cause of epilepsy based on high-resolution brain MRI and patient history in 119 consecutive thoroughly examined adult patients with refractory focal epilepsy followed up in our centre. We also evaluated the influence of aetiology and duration of epilepsy in this patient cohort on the chances of achieving 12-month remission in a 2-year follow-up.

Results: The major finding was that a substantial group of patients achieved remission; 30 (25%) initially refractory patients achieved at least 12 months remission during follow-up. A total of 40.0% of the patients with cryptogenic aetiology had achieved 12-month remission compared with the 16.2% patients with symptomatic aetiologies (age-adjusted OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.54 to 9.07, p = 0.004). Aetiologies often considered for surgical treatment (hippocampal sclerosis, cortical dysplasia, vascular malformation, tumour and dual pathology) carried an almost six-fold risk of persistent seizures compared with cryptogenic epilepsy (age-adjusted OR 5.85, 95% CI 2.00 to 17.11, p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Patients with vascular malformation and dual pathology as aetiology were most refractory, none being in remission for 12 months. There were also patients achieving 12-month remission after a long period of active epilepsy. These results encourage physicians to continue with new drug trials, especially on patients with no possibilities of epilepsy surgery, as well as on those still having seizures after epilepsy surgery.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.