|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Correspondence to: Professor Alan J Thompson, Department of Clinical Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK A.Thompson@ion.ucl.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| |
Introduction |
|---|
Although agents that
have a partial benefit on relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS) are
available, there is little to suggest that we are able to influence
disease progression in any meaningful way
thus the need to manage the
accumulating impairments and disability that accompany progression
actively. Attempting to evaluate and treat the wide range of
fluctuating and interacting symptoms associated with MS can be
frustrating and at times demoralising for patient and physician alike.
Additionally, available drug treatment is limited both in its efficacy
and in the evidence available to guide its use. Many agents are poorly
tolerated, often because they will exacerbate co-existing symptoms.
| Table Removed (Available Only in the Full Text) |
Given the limitations of drug treatment both for symptom management and
disease progression, it is essential that the neurologist is aware of
other approaches to management, knows when and how to refer to other
disciplines, and is able to explain the reasons for the referral.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Feys, W Helsen, X Liu, D Mooren, H Albrecht, B Nuttin, and P Ketelaer Effects of peripheral cooling on intention tremor in multiple sclerosis J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2005; 76(3): 373 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C D Ward, M Phillips, A Smith, and M Moran Multidisciplinary approaches in progressive neurological disease: can we do better? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2003; 74(90004): iv8 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |