JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mummery, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mummery, C
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Articles
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2002;73:358
© 2002 Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry


EDITORIAL COMMENTARY

Dementia

We are how we eat?

C Mummery

Department of Neurology, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5, UK; CathMummery@aol.com


The underlying neural substrates of eating behaviours

Keywords: Alzheimer’s dementia; frontotemporal dementia; eating patterns

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The two most common dementias in the presenium are Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Early and accurate diagnosis is critical for prognosis, consideration of genetic issues, and appropriate therapeutic intervention. Recognition of associated behavioural disturbance is paramount in order to address the enormous caregiver burden with sufficient resources. However, early recognition is still fraught with difficulty, exacerbated by a lack of systematic studies. As conventional cognitive assessment can fail to reveal significant behavioural deficits early in disease, it is imperative to develop new and sensitive tools, such as that described in the paper by Ikeda et al (this issue, pp 371–6).1

Previous work has shown that, although there are marked behavioural differences between FTD and AD, changes in eating preference are one of the few behaviour variables that reliably separate the two groups.2 Within FTD, in spite of the common perception that there is less behavioural disturbance . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Articles

Changes in appetite, food preference, and eating habits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease
M Ikeda, J Brown, A J Holland, R Fukuhara, and J R Hodges
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002 73: 371-376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Is multiple sclerosis a sexually transmitted infection?
C H Hawkes
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002 73: 439-443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.