JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, C M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, C M
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2003;74:147-148
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group


EDITORIAL COMMENTARY

Dementia

Dipoles and dementia

C M Epstein

Emory Clinic, Department of Neurology, 1365 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr C M Epstein;
chipstein@aol.com


Can the link between MEG dipoles and cortical activity lead to increased applications for the unique capabilities of MEG?

Keywords: dementia; dipoles; magnetoencephalography; Alzheimer’s

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

For almost two decades magnetoencephalography (MEG) has been the stepchild of functional neuroimaging. Despite its evolution from single sensors to arrays of more than 100, with unmatched temporal resolution, the legitimacy of MEG as a clinical and research tool has been repeatedly challenged. On the one hand, neurophysiologists persistently—and appropriately—question the advantage of MEG over scalp-recorded electroencephalograms and evoked potentials when the latter are analysed by sophisticated algorithms. On the other hand, advocates of functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography have disparaged MEG because of the assumptions required to obtain unique solutions from magnetic field data. The paper by Maestú et al (this issue, page 208-212)1 provides an example of work that is establishing the capabilities of MEG.

Maestú et al used MEG to compare patients with Alzheimer’s disease and elderly subjects. They had previously found that reduced MEG activation was present in left temporal . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Article

Do cognitive patterns of brain magnetic activity correlate with hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease?
F Maestú, J Arrazola, A Fernández, P G Simos, C Amo, P Gil-Gregorio, S Fernandez, A Papanicolaou, and T Ortiz
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2003 74: 208-212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.