|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY |
| Dementia |
Emory Clinic, Department of Neurology, 1365 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr C M Epstein;
chipstein@aol.com
Keywords: dementia; dipoles; magnetoencephalography; Alzheimers
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
For almost two decades magnetoencephalography (MEG) has been the stepchild of functional neuroimaging. Despite its evolution from single sensors to arrays of more than 100, with unmatched temporal resolution, the legitimacy of MEG as a clinical and research tool has been repeatedly challenged. On the one hand, neurophysiologists persistentlyand appropriatelyquestion the advantage of MEG over scalp-recorded electroencephalograms and evoked potentials when the latter are analysed by sophisticated algorithms. On the other hand, advocates of functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography have disparaged MEG because of the assumptions required to obtain unique solutions from magnetic field data. The paper by Maestú et al (this issue, page 208-212)1 provides an example of work that is establishing the capabilities of MEG.
Maestú et al used MEG to compare patients with Alzheimers disease and elderly subjects. They had previously found that reduced MEG activation was present in left temporal
Relevant Article
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2003 74: 208-212.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |