JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giovannoni, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giovannoni, G
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2004;75:1234
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EDITORIAL COMMENTARIES

IFN-ß treatment

Is it time to consider rationalising IFN-ß treatment in individuals with multiple sclerosis?

G Giovannoni

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
G Giovannoni
Department of Neuroinflammation, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK; G.Giovannoni@ion.ucl.ac.uk


Time to rationalise IFN-ß treatment

Keywords: interferon beta; multiple sclerosis; neutralising antibodies; MxA protein

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In this issue Antonio Bertolotto and colleagues (see pp 1294–9),1 use MxA mRNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to assess the in vivo bioactivity of interferon-beta (IFN-ß) treatment in patients with multiple slerosis (MS). MxA transcription and translation is relatively specific for the type 1 interferons, such as interferon-alpha (IFN-{alpha}) and IFN-ß, and plays an important role in the anti-viral response. MxA protein can also be used as readout for IFN-ß but with a longer temporal profile.2 MxA is therefore a suitable marker to assess the bioactivity of IFNß—i.e. receptor binding, second messenger activation, gene transcription, and, in the case of MxA protein, gene translation. It appears, however, that quantitative MxA mRNA expression has some advantages over the MxA protein translation. Firstly, it has a wider dynamic range and the RT-qPCR method used to quantify its expression should be easier to standardise.3 Unfortunately, . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.