JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirkpatrick, P J
Right arrow Articles by Ng, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirkpatrick, P J
Right arrow Articles by Ng, I
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2005;76:463-465
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EDITORIAL

Cerebral revascularisation

Cerebral revascularisation: where are we now?

P J Kirkpatrick1, I Ng2

1 University Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
2 Department of Neurosurgery (TTSH Campus), National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr P J Kirkpatrick
University Department of Neurosurgery, Block A Level 4, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK; pjk21@medschl.cam.ac.uk


Outcomes may be improved by standardising measurement of CBF and the surgical approach and centralising expertise

Keywords: cerebral blood flow; cerebrovascular reactivity; ec-ic bypass

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Enthusiasm for delivering an alternative blood supply to the brain by surgical means has waxed and waned for over three decades. In situations where a major cerebral vessel is sacrificed for removal of macroscopic pathology (such as a skull base tumour or giant intracranial aneurysm), the need to replace lost cerebral blood flow (CBF) is obvious and often required as part of a staged surgical procedure.1,2 In such cases, the need and type of surgical bypass graft (high or low flow) is dictated by the presence or absence of adequate collateral vascular pathways, the design of the circle of Willis, and any extracranial to intracranial (EC-IC) vascular connections.3 Detailed cranial angiography and observation of the clinical and physiological responses to temporary test occlusion of parent vessels provide the relevant information. When reliably practised, daunting cervical and cranial pathologies can be approached confidently with acceptable morbidity.4 Although simple in . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.