JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leys, D
Right arrow Articles by Pruvo, J-P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leys, D
Right arrow Articles by Pruvo, J-P
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Articles
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2005;76:467
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EDITORIAL COMMENTARY

Neurosurgical communication

A failure to communicate: patients with cerebral aneurysms and vascular neurosurgeons

D Leys, J-P Lejeune, J-P Pruvo

University of Lille, Service de Neurologie B, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Rue Emile Laine, Lille 59037, France

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Didier Leys
dleys@nordnet.fr


Many patients have an inaccurate understanding of their treatment plan

Keywords: aneurysm; neurosurgery; doctor-patient communication

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In the paper by King et al (this issue, pp 550–4),1 an analysis of the communication between neurosurgeons and their patients with unruptured aneurysms was conducted immediately after an outpatient appointment in a neurosurgery clinic. Many patients had an inaccurate understanding of their treatment plan, and an exaggerated sense of the risks of treatments and of the disease. Despite methodological limitations discussed by the authors, the results of this study are consistent with those found in other specialties.

Communication is of special importance whenever there is a choice between two therapeutic options—that is, when the decision depends mainly on the patient’s preference. Practitioners should be sure that their information was correctly understood. This holds true especially when the event we want to prevent is potentially devastating, the therapeutic options invasive and risky, leading to irreversible changes, and the risk of spontaneous occurrence of this event is low. . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Articles

Persistent neurocognitive impairments associated with severe falciparum malaria in Kenyan children
J A Carter, V Mung’ala-Odera, B G R Neville, G Murira, N Mturi, C Musumba, and C R J C Newton
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2005 76: 476-481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A failure to communicate: patients with cerebral aneurysms and vascular neurosurgeons
J T King, Jr, H Yonas, M B Horowitz, A B Kassam, and M S Roberts
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2005 76: 550-554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.