JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2006;77:1104-1105; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.087874
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nirmalananthan, N
Right arrow Articles by Hanna, M G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nirmalananthan, N
Right arrow Articles by Hanna, M G
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

EDITORIAL COMMENTARY

Steroid response

Predicting steroid response in muscle disease

N Nirmalananthan, M G Hanna

Centre for Neuromuscular Disease, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
M G Hanna
Centre for Neuromuscular Disease, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK; mhanna@ion.ucl.ac.uk


Granulysin expression or glucocorticoid receptor polymorphisms may be factors underlying the variable steroid response in patients with myopathies

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and genetic muscular dystrophies are distinct and well-recognised clinical entities. However, it is increasingly evident that there is overlap in both the clinical presentation1 and the pathophysiology2 of the two groups.

The preferred management of polymyositis and dermatomyositis has traditionally been with corticosteroids and, although controlled clinical trial data to support this are lacking, the efficacy of these drugs has long been established in clinical practice. However, not all patients respond to steroids.

Non-response rates of up to 40% have been reported, but it has become increasingly clear in recent years that polymyositis in particular has been overdiagnosed, and many of these patients actually had inclusion-body myositis (IBM), for which there is no strong evidence of a response to steroids, or a form of muscular dystrophy. The classical Bohan and Peter criteria for the diagnosis of polymyositis have been modified to include other criteria, such . . . [Full text of this article]


Related Articles

The glucocorticoid receptor N363S polymorphism and steroid response in Duchenne dystrophy
D M Bonifati, S F Witchel, M Ermani, E P Hoffman, C Angelini, and E Pegoraro
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006 77: 1177-1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Expression of granulysin in polymyositis and inclusion-body myositis
K Ikezoe, S Ohshima, M Osoegawa, M Tanaka, K Ogawa, K Nagata, and J-i Kira
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006 77: 1187-1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.