JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER


[Advanced]
Published Online First: 17 July 2006. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.099697
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2006;77:1105
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnnp.2006.099697v1
77/10/1105    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleminger, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleminger, S
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
Head injury

Patients after a head injury face an uncertain long-term future

S Fleminger

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
S Fleminger
Lishman Unit, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AZ, UK;s.fleminger@iop.kcl.ac.uk

Long-term changes in patients after head injury: for better or for worse?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

After a head injury, it is sometimes assumed that once the first 2–3 years of recovery have passed, any impairment and disability remaining is fairly fixed. There will be little further improvement and in the unlikely event of any subsequent deterioration, the clinician should expect to be able to find a specific cause—for example, hydrocephalus—for the decline. However, longer-term follow-up studies suggest that in fact a fair proportion of patients change, some for the better and some for the worse.

The last time the Journal considered this issue was in 2003.1 Millar et al2 found that at 18 years follow-up after a head injury, twice as many patients had deteriorated (32%) as improved (15%) compared with how they were 6 months after the injury. There was no evidence that a biological marker, APOE {varepsilon}4 status, could predict who would deteriorate. Since then, another group from Glasgow, again using . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Article

Long-term effect of head trauma on intellectual abilities: a 16-year outcome study
RLI Wood and N A Rutterford
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006 77: 1180-1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.