JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2006;77:570; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.085241
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleminger, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleminger, S
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

EDITORIAL COMMENTARY

Neurorehabilitation

Can severely disabled patients benefit from in-patient neurorehabilitation for acquired brain injury?

S Fleminger

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S Fleminger
Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK; s.fleminger@iop.kcl.ac.uk


Neurorehabilitation may be most cost efficient in those with the most severe disability

Keywords: acquired brain injury; continuing care; cost efficiency; FIM; functional independence measure; rehabilitation

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry publishes few papers on the systems and costs of health service provision. Those it does should have a clear clinical message for our multidisciplinary readership as is the case for the paper by Turner-Stokes et al (see pages634–9) on the cost efficiency of neurorehabilitation.1

Commissioners of health services, given the task of getting value for money for their patients, want to know that the treatments offered are effective and that the cost matches the size of the effect; treatments should be cost effective. But commissioners of rehabilitation services and long term care may also ask, can it save us money in the long term? By investing in this treatment will the patient need less expensive care in the future?

Turner-Stokes et al have addressed this last question by looking at the cost efficiency of in-patient neurorehabilitation; how efficient . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Article

Efficiency of specialist rehabilitation in reducing dependency and costs of continuing care for adults with complex acquired brain injuries
L Turner-Stokes, S Paul, and H Williams
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006 77: 634-639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.