JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2006;77:799; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.082982
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vroomen, P C A J
Right arrow Articles by Muratoglu, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vroomen, P C A J
Right arrow Articles by Muratoglu, M

LETTER

Misleading conclusions on rt-PA treatment in the very elderly

P C A J Vroomen1, M Uyttenbogaart1, G J Luijckv1

1 Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, Netherlands; c.a.j.vroomen@neuro.umcg.nl

Keywords: rt-PA treatment; elderly

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The effectiveness of rt-PA in the elderly is an important but as yet incompletely resolved topic. In a recent paper in this journal,1 Mouradian et al provide convincing data that patients older than 80 years who receive rt-PA are less likely to have a favourable outcome than their younger counterparts. This is in keeping with our own data showing that 5 of 24 patients (21%) treated with rt-PA aged 80 years or older were independent (mRS 0–2) after three months, compared with 39 of 77 patients younger than 80 years (51%).

However, their data and ours provide no indication that rt-PA is less effective in the elderly. The chance of a favourable outcome from a stroke declines with advancing age.2 To show that the effectiveness of rt-PA decreases with age, the authors would need to have demonstrated that the worse outcome in the very elderly with rt-PA is more pronounced . . . [Full text of this article]

A Shuaib, M Muratoglu

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Division of Neurology and Stroke Program
University of Alberta, Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; ashfaq.shuaib@ualberta.ca




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M. Dirks, L. W Niessen, P. J Koudstaal, C. L Franke, R. J van Oostenbrugge, D. W J Dippel, and the members of the Delphi panel on indications and
Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: from trial exclusion criteria to clinical contraindications. An international Delphi study
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 78(7): 685 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.