JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2008;79:238; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.134205
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ringelstein, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dittrich, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ringelstein, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dittrich, R.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

EDITORIAL COMMENTARIES

MES, what a mess! A modern version of Russian roulette

Erich Bernd Ringelstein, Ralf Dittrich

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany

Correspondence to:
Professor E B Ringelstein, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str 33, D-48149 Münster, Germany; ringels@uni-muenster.de

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Arterial embolic sources are "smoking guns", and microembolic signals (MES) detected in the middle cerebral artery by transcranial ultrasound reflect the patient’s risk of receiving another "shot". In their paper, Iguchi and colleagues1 convincingly demonstrated that a considerable proportion of acute stroke patients with MES detected 48 h after stroke onset are at high risk of additional consecutive ischaemic brain lesions despite state-of-the-art anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (see page 253). This supports the idea of embolic sources acting as a sword of Damocles, and again raises the discussion of intensified antithrombotic strategies in stroke patients positive for MES.

In 1999, Molloy and Markus2 demonstrated that the detection of MES is related to a higher risk of stroke and transient ischaemic attack in patients with carotid artery stenosis. In a recently published paper by Nakajima and colleagues,3 a higher number of ischaemic lesions on diffusion weighted imaging were found . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Article

Microembolic signals at 48 hours after stroke onset contribute to new ischaemia within a week
Y Iguchi, K Kimura, K Kobayashi, Y Ueno, K Shibazaki, and T Inoue
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008 79: 253-259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.