JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2008;79:489; doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.137950
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Touzé, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Touzé, E.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

EDITORIAL COMMENTARIES

Can aortic MRI be used instead of transoesophagal echocardiography in patients with ischaemic stroke?

Emmanuel Touzé

Correspondence to:
Dr Emmanuel Touzé, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Descartes (Paris 5), Department of Neurology, EA 4055, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 1 rue Cabanis, 75674 Paris Cedex 14, France; e.touze@ch-sainte-anne.fr

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

High resolution MRI of the vessel wall and atherosclerotic plaque is an area of increasing development.1 In this issue of J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, Harloff and colleagues2 assessed the accuracy of 3 T MRI to detect aortic sources of cerebral embolism in comparison with transoesophagal echocardiography (TOE) (see page 540). They suggest that not only is MRI reliable in detecting aortic high risk plaques, but it is also potentially more accurate in investigating aortic segments that are not identified by TOE. Although there is little doubt that vessel MRI is a very promising technique, the authors’ enthusiasm needs to be qualified.

Firstly, as underlined by the Bland and Altman plot, there is very poor agreement between the two techniques, with MRI overestimating plaque thickness and consequently classifying more patients as high risk (>=4 mm aortic plaques). Moreover, it is still uncertain whether the cut-off used to . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Article

Reliability of aortic MRI at 3 Tesla in patients with acute cryptogenic stroke
A Harloff, P Dudler, A Frydrychowicz, C Strecker, A L Stroh, A Geibel, C Weiller, A Hetzel, J Hennig, and M Markl
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008 79: 540-546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.