Letters to the editor
Neuropsychological effects of pallidotomy in patients with Parkinson's disease
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Whether patients with Parkinson's disease develop cognitive impairments or improvements after ventral pallidotomy is still a debated issue.1 Recent studies produced contradictory findings which may have resulted from methodological factors such as differences in surgical techniques, neuropsychological assessments, duration of follow up, and the lack of evaluations of non-operated controls with Parkinson's disease.1
We assessed a consecutive series of 27 patients with Parkinson's
disease who received unilateral pallidotomy using the microelectrode registration technique.2 Sixteen of these patients
received a 3-6 month follow up evaluation, and 10 of them received a
12 month follow up evaluation. They were compared with a non-operated control group of 20 patients with Parkinson's disease matched for age,
severity of extrapyramidal symptoms, and overall cognitive status who
received the same neuropsychological evaluation at baseline and 12 months later. The neuropsychological examination included the Raven's
progressive matrices, the Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST), the
controlled oral word association test, the Buschke
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
