JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2008

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Published Online First: 23 November 2007. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.112334
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnnp.2006.112334v1
jnnp.2006.112334v2
79/5/504    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plaha, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, S. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plaha, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, S. S

Original articles

Bilateral stimulation of the caudal zona incerta nucleus for tremor control

Puneet Plaha 1*, Sadaquate Khan 1 and Steven S Gill 1

1 Frenchay Hospital, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: plaha100{at}yahoo.co.uk.

Accepted 25 October 2007


*  Abstract

Introduction: The ventralis lateral (VL) nucleus of the thalamus is the commonly chosen target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) to alleviate tremor. However, it has a poor efficacy in alleviating proximal tremor and patients may develop tolerance to the action component of tremor. We performed bilateral stimulation of the caudal or motor part of the zona incerta nucleus (cZI) to determine its safety and efficacy in alleviating tremor.

Methods: 5 patients with parkinsonian tremor and 13 with a range of tremors (Holmes(HT), Cerebellar(CT), Essential(ET), Multiple sclerosis(MS) and Dystonic tremor(DT) affecting both the proximal and distal body parts underwent MRI guided, bilateral cZI DBS. Tremor was assessed by the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) tremor scale at baseline and at a mean follow up of 12-months.

Results: Resting PD tremor improved by 94.8% and postural by 88.2%. The total tremor score improved by 75.9% in 6 patients with ET. HT improved by 70.2%, proximal CT by 60.4% and proximal MS tremor by 57.2% in the total tremor rating score. In the single patient with DT there was improvement in both the dystonia and the tremor. Patients required low voltages of high frequency stimulation and did not develop tolerance to it. Stimulation related side effects were transient.

Conclusion: This prospective study shows that the cZI may be an alternative target for the treatment of tremor with DBS. In contrast to bilateral DBS of the VL nucleus it improves all components of tremor affecting both the distal and proximal limbs as well as the axial musculature.


Keywords: Bilateral, Caudal zona incerta, DBS, Proximal and distal tremor







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.