JNNP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2008

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Published Online First: 10 September 2007. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.122457
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnnp.2007.122457v1
79/5/530    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lazar, R. M
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, R. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lazar, R. M
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, R. S

Original articles

Variability in language recovery after first-time Stroke

Ronald M Lazar 1*, Allison E Speizer 1, Joanne R Festa 1, John W Krakauer 1 and Randolph S Marshall 1

1 Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ral22{at}columbia.edu.

Accepted 15 August 2007


*  Abstract

Background:Predicting aphasia recovery after stroke has been difficult because of substantial variability in outcomes. Few studies have characterized the nature and extent of recovery, beginning with baselines at 24-72 hours after stroke onset.

Aim:To characterize the course of language recovery after first-time stroke.

Methods:Using our Performance and Recovery in Stroke Study (PARIS) database, we evaluated consecutive first-time stroke patients with aphasia and DWI-positive lesions on admission and at 90 days.

Results:Twenty-two of 91 patients had language disorders. Initial syndrome scores were positively correlated with 90-days scores (r = .60) and negatively correlated with the change score from baseline to follow-up ( r = -.66). Neither lesion size, age nor education correlated with initial syndrome severity or with performance at 90 days. Level of education was not associated with degree of recovery. A multiple regression model that combined lesion size, age and initial syndrome was significant (p = .03) but only explained 29% of the variance. Patients with severe deficits at baseline in individual language domains could recover, improve to a less severe deficit, or not improve at all.

Conclusion:There was significant variability in language recovery after first-time stroke, even in more severe, initial syndromes. Traditional predictors of post-stroke language outcomes did not reliably predict function at 90 days. These data suggest other factors have not yet been identified that account for functional stroke recovery.


Keywords: aphasia, recovery of function, stroke







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.