Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Line bisection in hemianopia
  1. Jason J S Bartona,
  2. Sandra E Blackb
  1. aDepartments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, bDivision of Neurology, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  1. Dr J J S Barton, Department of Neurology KS 446, Beth Israel Hospital, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Telephone 001 617 667 1243; fax 001 617 975 5322; email jbarton{at}bidmc.harvard.edu

Abstract

The effect of hemianopia on line bisection is not known. To study this, manual line bisection in 30 patients with unilateral cerebral hemispheric lesions was examined. The mean bisection point in a group of eight patients with left hemineglect was biased rightward (ipsilaterally), as expected. Among the remaining 22 patients, eight had right hemianopic visual defects, eight had left hemianopic visual defects, and six had normal visual fields. Both groups of patients with contralateral visual field defects had mean bisection points biased contralaterally, compared with 68 normal subjects. This bias was less than the ipsilateral (opposite) bias of patients with hemineglect. Contralateral bisection bias was more evident in those whose field defect involved the macular region. No bias was seen in patients with neither field defects nor hemineglect. The contralateral bias in hemianopia may represent either non-veridical spatial representation within a visual hemifield or a consequence of the strategic adaptation of attention into contralateral hemispace after hemianopia.

  • line bisection
  • hemianopia
  • neglect
  • attention

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes