Article Text

PDF

Single fibre electromyography in multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks
  1. A Laguenya,
  2. G Le Massona,
  3. P Burbeaudb,
  4. Ph Deliacb
  1. aDepartment of Clinical Neurology CHU Bordeaux, France, bDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology CHU Bordeaux, France
  1. Dr A Lagueny, Service de Neurologie, Hopital du Haut-Leveque, USN, Avenue de Magellan, 33604 Pessac, France. Telephone 0033 556 420; fax 0033 556 815.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To study the process of denervation-reinnervation in multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks in clinically affected and unaffected muscles.

METHOD Volitional single fibre electromyography (SFEMG) was performed in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) of seven patients. The jitter, the fibre density, and the mean interpotential interval were determined. The results before and after treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) between the unaffected EDC and affected EDC examined during the same SFEMG session were also compared. In addition the values of jitter, fibre density, and mean interpotential interval were analysed for correlation with the strength score on the MRC scale, the duration of the neuropathy, the number of IVIg treatment periods, and the radial nerve conduction block values.

RESULTS Mean jitter, percentage of jitters>60 μs, and impulse blocking percentage, were higher than normal in both the affected EDCs and to a lesser degree in unaffected EDCs. Jitter decreased significantly after IVIg and correlated only with the MRC score. Fibre density and mean interpotential interval were higher than normal equally in the affected EDC and unaffected EDCs, but no correlation was found with strength, duration of the neuropathy, number of treatment periods, and conduction block values.

CONCLUSION The major finding is the presence of SFEMG abnormalities in clinically unaffected EDCs. This shows a process of denervation-reinnervation even in the absence of clinical symptoms, probably more frequent than commonly supposed in this neuropathy. The rapid clinical improvement after IVIg infusions could be due to remyelination after demyelination and to an interference of IVIg with the blocking effect of antibodies on the Na+ channels at the motor nerve endings.

  • multifocal motor neuropathy
  • single fibre electromyography

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks is asymmetric, with progressive and sometimes stepwise evolution, affecting more often the distal part of the upper limbs.1 Diagnosis is based on the presence of conduction blocks along the motor nerves outside the areas of possible compression.2 Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks is considered an immune mediated demyelinating neuropathy.3 Experimental conduction blocks can be induced using the serum of patients with high titres of circulating antibodies to GM1,4-6 although the link between the motor conduction blocks and the anti-GM1 antibodies has not been definitely established.7 8 Weakness improves rapidly, although often temporarily,9 10 with high doses of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg).11-13 On the other hand, some patients who are less responsive to IVIg14develop atrophy of the muscles innervated by the nerves involved in the dysimmune demyelinating process. In more severe forms, the neuropathy may mimic an anterior horn cell disease.15 In these cases, standard EMG may detect signs of denervation with fibrillation potentials, and signs of reinnervation with giant motor unit action potentials (MUAPs), suggesting an extension of the territory of the motor units, or at least an increase of fibre density in the uptake area of the coaxial needle. A means of investigating the process of denervation-reinnervation during the course of a neurogenic involvement is to use single fibre electromyography (SFEMG),16 17 and this was used here to study the functional status of the motor units during the course of the multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks.

Patients and methods

PATIENTS

Seven patients with an involvement of the extensors at the forearm, unilateral in four and bilateral in three, were included in the study, the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) being chosen for SFEMG examination. All patients had developed an asymmetric motor neuropathy beginning in the upper limbs, with a progressive deterioration in four and a stepwise deterioration in three. The time between the presumed onset of the neuropathy and the electrophysiological diagnosis ranged from 10 to 60 months. No patient displayed signs of upper motor neuron or bulbar involvement. Sensory examination was normal in all the patients, although one complained of paraesthesia in the ulnar area, and another of diffuse pain in the right hand but which had disappeared when the weakness appeared. A distal atrophy of the upper limbs was found in three patients, bilateral and slight in two and unilateral but more marked in the other. Protein concentration in CSF was within the normal limit in all the patients, and anti-GM1 antibody titres measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were significantly high in four of the seven. Once diagnosis was made, treatment with IVIg (0.4 g/kg/day for 5 days) was given, which improved strength temporarily. When renewed, treatment usually provided the same effect. Additional treatment with oral cyclophosphamide (CTx: 2 mg/kg/day) was given in two patients who were more severely affected. The table provides clinical and biological data at diagnosis including the titres of anti-GM1 antibodies when significantly positive (>20).

METHOD

Electrodiagnosis was performed using Dantec Counterpoint MKII apparatus.

Determination of the conduction block

Surface electrodes were used for stimulating the nerves and recording the compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs). A conduction block was considered when the CMAP amplitude and the negative phase area on proximal stimulation was at least 50% smaller, with a negative peak duration at the most 15% longer, than on distal stimulation. In these cases attempts were made to determine the shortest measurable limb segment, to reduce the influence of conduction dispersion and phase cancellation on the negative phase area.18 19 The sites of supramaximal stimulation were for (a) the median nerve with recording from the abductor pollicis brevis: wrist, elbow, axilla, and Erb’s point ; (b) the ulnar nerve with recording from the abductor digiti minimi: wrist, below elbow, above elbow, axilla, and Erb’s point; (c) the radial nerve with recording from the extensor indicis: elbow, radial groove, and posterior cord of the brachial plexus, (d) the tibial nerve with recording from the abductor hallucis: ankle, and popliteal fossa; and (e) the peroneal nerve with recording from the extensor digitorum brevis: ankle, below the fibula, and above the fibula.

In addition to motor nerve conductions, routine electrodiagnosis included: concentric needle EMG (but in which amplitude, duration, and number of phases of individual MUAPs were not systematically analysed) and antidromic sensory nerve conductions from the superficial sensory radial and sural nerves. Conduction studies were performed at a skin temperature of 32°C.

Single fibre electromyography

Single fibre electromyography was performed using the SFEMG programme of the Counterpoint and a Nicolet SFEMG electrode (length 40 mm). Volitional SFEMG was chosen because it is more suitable than stimulated SFEMG for studying fibre density. The EDC was examined when the MRC score was at least 3 to permit recording of an adequate number of muscle fibre action potentials in various motor units to provide the fibre density and mean interpotential interval. The time between the onset of symptoms and the first SFEMG examination varied from 15 to 54 months. The examinations were performed before the perfusions of IVIg and during the period of efficiency of IVIg, as all patients were good responders. In one patient we were able to use this procedure five times over a period of 50 months; we used it four times in one other and three times in the remaining five. From one session to the next, various parts of the EDC were explored to minimise the risk of recording in areas damaged by the SFEMG needle during the previous session. In the four patients with unilateral involvement, we examined the opposite EDC, which had never been involved clinically. The high pass filter was set at 500 Hz, the amplifier gain between 200 μV and 1 mV, and the sweep speed between 0.5 and 5 ms/division, depending on the amplitude of the muscle action potentials and the duration of the complexes formed by the muscle fibre action potentials of each motor unit in the uptake area of the SFEMG electrode. More than 20 different sites from the EDC were investigated. Action potentials with amplitudes>200 μV and rise times<300 μs were selected for calculating fibre density and jitter. The mean value of consecutive differences over 100 discharges from each action potential pair, and the mean jitter with SD, were calculated by the SFEMG software of the Counterpoint from 20 pairs with an IPI<4 ms. The mean interpotential interval was calculated with the formula:meaninterpotentialinterval=N1dn1/N

where N is the number of the complexes studied, d the duration between the negative peaks of the first and last action potentials, and n the number of action potentials. The upper limits of normal values, taking into account the age of the patients, are those of multicentre studies16 17: fibre density<2, mean jitter<40 with no more than 10% of MCD values >60 μs, and mean interpotential interval⩽0.70.

STATISTICS

Using the Mann-Whitney test we compared the values of the SFEMG indices: fibre density, mean jitter, percentage of jitter>60 μs, the proportion of pairs blocked (impulse blocking percentage), and mean interpotential interval, obtained before IVIg and during the effect of IVIg. We also compared the results of the SFEMG indices on the affected and unaffected sides examined during the same session. Using the Spearman rank test, we also searched for correlations between the SFEMG indices and the following: time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and the SFEMG session, the number of IVIg courses, the MRC score of the EDC examined, and the degree of the conduction block (conduction block percentage) in the radial nerve evaluated at each session.

Results

CONDUCTION BLOCKS

Conduction blocks were found in at least three nerves, including the radial nerve, in all the patients except one where blocks were found in the ulnar and median nerves but not in the radial nerve. However, it was probable that the weakness of the EDC in this patient resulted from proximal or distal conduction blocks in the radial nerve which were not detected by the method used. A low CMAP amplitude after distal stimulation, resulting either from a distal conduction block or axonal loss, was found in three patients.

STANDARD EMG

Standard EMG showed reduced recruitment with some large potentials in the affected EDC, and normal patterns in the unaffected EDC at diagnosis, but standard EMG was not performed at the SFEMG sessions. Antidromic sensory nerve conductions were normal.

MEAN VALUES OF THE SFEMG INDICES

The mean values of the SFEMG indices were all abnormal. On the affected side, mean jitter was 73 μs before treatment and decreased significantly on IVIg to 44 μs, which was however above the normal upper limit; the percentage of jitter>60 μs and the impulse blocking percentage, respectively 44% and 13% before treatment, also decreased significantly on IVIg, to 20% and 4% respectively. On the other hand fibre density and mean interpotential interval, respectively 3.5 and 1.02 before treatment, did not change significantly (respectively 3.6 and 0.96) after IVIg (fig 1A). The SFEMG indices were also all abnormal in the EDC on the clinically unaffected side. However, on the unaffected side the mean jitter (45 μs), the percentage of jitter>60 μs (19.2%), and the impulse blocking percentage (3.2%) were significantly lower than on the affected side examined at the same session (74 μs, 50.6%, and 14.6% respectively). On the other hand the values of fibre density and mean interpotential interval were not statistically different between the unaffected side (3.2 and 0.88) and the affected side (4.0 and 1.18) (fig 1B). In only one patient the unaffected EDC displayed normal mean jitter but with abnormal fibre density and abnormal mean interpotential interval. Another clinically unaffected EDC, displaying abnormal SFEMG indices at examination, later became clinically affected.

Figure 1

(A) Comparison of the SFEMG indices: mean jitter, percentage of jitter > 60 μs, percentage of impulse blocking (IB), fibre density (FD), and mean interpotential interval (MIPI) in the affected extensor digitorum communis(EDCs) between, before, and after IVIg. All values are abnormal. Mean jitter, percentage of jitters>60 μs, and percentage of IB decreased significantly on IVIg, but not fibre density and mean interpotential interval. ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. Upper normal limit is indicated by the dotted line. (B) Comparison of the SFEMG indices between affected and unaffected EDCs examined at the same session. The values are also abnormal in the unaffected EDCs. Mean jitter, percentage of jitter>60 μs, and percentage of IB were significantly lower in unaffected EDC than in affected EDC, but fibre density and mean interpotential interval were not. *p<0.05. Upper normal limit is indicated by the dotted line.

As jitter decreased on IVIg, it was not surprising to find a strong correlation between the MRC score and the following indices: mean jitter (r=0.674, p=0.0001), percentage of jitter>60% (r=0.669, p=0.0009), and impulse blocking percentage (r=0.676, p=0.0005); the lower the MRC score, the higher the jitter. On the other hand, jitter, fibre density, and mean interpotential interval were not correlated with the time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and the SFEMG examinations, the number of IVIg courses, and the conduction block percentage.

Discussion

In peripheral neuropathy, lesions of the motor axons result in a process of denervation-reinnervation which is responsible for changes in the functional status of the motor units investigated by SFEMG.16 17 These changes include increased fibre density (a marker of reinnervation through axonal sprouting), longer interpotential interval increasing with length of collateral sproutings, and increased jitter with blocking in the newly formed neuromuscular junctions during the process of reinnervation. Abnormal jitters and impulse blockings are numerous in rapidly evolving denervations as a result of abnormal neuromuscular transmission in immature end plates. To a lesser extent disturbed conductions along the nerve twigs and muscle fibres may also increase jitter.

Jitter, fibre density, and mean interpotential interval were abnormal in the EDC of seven patients with multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks in both clinically affected and unaffected EDCs, indicating a process of denervation-reinnervation even in the clinically unaffected EDC (fig 2). In neuromuscular diseases jitter is dependent on the motor unit discharge rate. It could be deduced, therefore, that the decrease of jitter in the affected EDC after IVIg may result only from the decrease of motor unit discharge. However, the discharge rate was monitored by a rate meter, and maintained by our patients at roughly the same level whatever the MRC score. We therefore postulate that the decrease of the mean jitter resulted directly from the IVIg infusions which improved strength in affected muscles, and not from a decrease of the motor unit discharge rate. On treatment, as jitter was diminishing, the complexes became more stable than during a relapse, although the jitter usually remained above the upper limit of the normal even when the strength became normal again. However, no correlation was found between the values of jitter and the total number of infusions, confirming the clinically non-cumulative effect of the infusions.

Figure 2

Three examples of SFEMG from the extensor digitorum communis. Twenty consecutive discharges of three complexes with increased jitters and long interpotential intervals are shown.

Infusion of IVIg is effective within a week in up to 90% of patients with multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks. It could interfere with antibody-antigen binding at the nodes of Ranvier.1 The rapid clinical improvement is usually accompanied by a reduction of conduction blocks, or an increase in the distal CMAP amplitude.20 In the rat, one mechanism underlying amelioration of strength and conduction block after a focal demyelinative lesion produced by intraneural injection of antiserum from rabbits is remyelination. This has been reported to appear 8 days after the injection.21 However, another mechanism may be implicated. Conduction blocks have been induced by anti-GM1 antibodies which block the Na+ channels in the presence of complement.22 Moreover, the serum of patients with multifocal motor neuropathy with or without anti-GM1 antibodies has been found to induce a rapid reduction of the end plate potential at the neuromuscular junction. The mechanism is not an interference with acetylcholine release but more probably a blockade of the Na+ current in the distal part of the motor nerve and consequently of the action potential electrogenesis.23Failure of the release of acetylcholine due to the immunological blockade of the Na+ channels in the distal part of the motor nerve,24 rapidly reversed by IVIg which interferes with this blockade, could explain why jitter increased during the relapses before IVIg in our patients, and decreased after infusion as strength improved.

Fibre density and mean interpotential interval were also abnormal, even in the clinically unaffected EDCs. Unlike jitter, the fibre density and mean interpotential interval values did not correlate with the effect of the IVIg. Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks is a chronic neuropathy in which the immunological process inhibits remyelination and reorganisation of Na+ channels, and can damage the axonal membrane.25 26 The axonal damage is responsible for atrophy appearing in some cases. The more severe forms of the neuropathy may mimic a lower motor neuron disease with large MUAPs and late components on standard EMG.27Loss of spinal motor neurons, probably by retrograde degeneration from axonal damage at the roots, has been demonstrated in a neuropathological study of one case.28

In axonal damage without atrophy, SFEMG is a means of detecting a slight chronic involvement accompanied by changes in the functional status of the motor units.16 17 The finding of increased fibre density and increased mean interpotential interval in clinically unaffected EDC where coaxial needle examination was normal at diagnosis, is interesting. It shows that the axonal damage may be present before the occurrence of clinical signs. However, the jitter in the unaffected EDC was much less abnormal than in the controlateral affected EDC examined during the same session, suggesting that collateral reinnervation with a sufficient number of mature end plates may be one of the compensatory mechanisms explaining the normal strength in some muscles in multifocal motor neuropathy independently of whether the lesions of the motor axons are primary or secondary to demyelination.

Conclusion

The results of our SFEMG study in multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks suggest a dual mechanism for the abnormalities found. One could be due to the blocking effect of antibodies on the Na+ channels,29 rapidly reversible using IVIg infusion and probably accounting for the correlation between the jitter and the score of the MRC rating scale. The other, slower mechanism, could be due to a denervation-reinnervation process, with increased fibre density, increased mean interpotential interval, and also increased jitter, the abnormality of which depends on the severity of the axonal involvement and the number of immature end plates. This process is probably more frequent than supposed in this neuropathy.

References

Table 1

Demographic data

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.