rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:178-185 doi:10.1136/jnnp.68.2.178
  • Paper

Resolution of disorientation and amnesia during post-traumatic amnesia

  1. Robyn L Tatea,
  2. Anne Pfaffb,
  3. Linda Jurjevica
  1. aRehabilitation Studies Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, and Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Australia, bBrain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  1. Associate Professor R Tate, Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Department of Medicine, Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, PO Box 6, Ryde, NSW 1680, Australia email rtate{at}med.usyd.edu.au
  • Received 16 March 1999
  • Revised 29 June 1999
  • Accepted 16 August 1999

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Despite the growing number of instruments for the prospective measurement of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) after traumatic brain injury, fundamental issues about the natural history of its resolution and methods of examination remain unresolved. The aims of the present study were to: (1) examine the sequence of resolution of disorientation and amnesia, and (2) determine if the method of measuring the memory component affected the duration of PTA.

METHODS The sample comprised 31 severely injured patients admitted to a brain injury rehabilitation unit who were examined daily until they emerged from PTA. They were administered a composite PTA scale, covering orientation and memory items from standard PTA scales. Patients were consecutively allocated to one of two groups according to the method of measuring the memory component. Each group was administered identical materials with a different procedure.

RESULTS The most common sequence for resolution of disorientation in both groups was person, followed by place, then time. Overall, amnesia resolved before disorientation in 94% of cases. Correlation coefficients between return of components of orientation and memory were all highly significant, ranging from r=0.81 to 0.93. Significant variability occurred in the number of days to emerge from PTA according to the scale used. There was evidence that the method of measuring memory influenced the patient's capacity to consistently sustain criterion scores on the scale.

CONCLUSIONS These results are contrary to findings in mildly injured patients, in whom orientation usually returns before memory. They also demonstrate that the duration of PTA will be dictated by the method used. These findings raise validity issues with respect to the prospective measurement of PTA, and in particular determining when an individual patient has emerged from PTA, which require further investigation.

Footnotes

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs