OBJECTIVES The ability of 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG PET) to detect malignant change in plexiform neurofibromas from patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) was evaluated.
METHODS Eighteen NF1 patients who presented with pain, increase in size, or neurological deficit associated with a plexiform neurofibroma were assessed. Magnetic resonance imaging determined the site and extent of the lesion. Qualitative18FDG PET was performed and the standard uptake value (SUV) measured the regional glucose metabolism. Histological confirmation of the diagnosis was obtained in 10 patients.
RESULTS Twenty three plexiform neurofibromas were detected in 18 patients. Seven malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours, four high grade and three low grade tumours, occurred in five patients. In one patient the clinical and radiological characteristics of the tumour suggested malignancy, but histology was inconclusive. Fifteen benign plexiform neurofibromas were identified in 12 patients and these findings were confirmed histologically in five lesions from four patients. Ten plexiform neurofibromas occurring in eight patients were considered benign on18FDG PET and the patients did not undergo surgery. They remained stable or their symptoms improved on clinical follow up (median 9 months). The results of qualitative 18FDG PET were interpreted as indicating that 13 plexiform neurofibromas were benign and 10 were malignant. No malignant tumours were classified as benign, but two benign tumours were reported as malignant. The SUV was calculated for 20 tumours and was significantly higher in five malignant tumours 5.4 (SD 2.4), than in 15 benign tumours 1.54 (SD 0.7), p=0.002. There was an overlap between benign and malignant tumours in the SUV range 2.7–3.3.
CONCLUSIONS 18FDG PET is helpful in determining malignant change in plexiform neurofibromas in NF1. Increased separation between benign and malignant lesions could be obtained by calculating the SUV at about 200 minutes after injection of 18FDG, when the peak activity concentration is obtained in malignant tumours.
- neurofibromatosis 1
- plexiform neurofibroma
- malignant peripheral nerve
- sheath tumour
- 18FDG positron emission tomography
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- neurofibromatosis 1
- plexiform neurofibroma
- malignant peripheral nerve
- sheath tumour
- 18FDG positron emission tomography
Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a common autosomal dominant disease with an estimated birth incidence of 1 in 2500.1 The cardinal features of NF1 are café au lait spots, neurofibromas, iris Lisch nodules, and skinfold freckling. The diagnostic criteria were formulated by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Statement in 1988.2 The complications are manifold, may affect any of the body systems, and vary, even within the same family.
Neurofibromas are benign skin tumours arising from the connective tissue of nerve sheaths, especially the endoneurium.3 They are composed predominantly of Schwann cells and fibroblasts, in addition to axons, perineurial cells, mast cells, and extracellular matrix.4 They may be discrete dermal or nodular lesions or plexiform neurofibromas. Plexiform neurofibromas differ from discrete neurofibromas because they have an expanded extracellular matrix, grow along the length of a nerve, and may involve multiple fascicles and branches. They interdigitate with surrounding structures, often resulting in diffuse hypertrophy of bone and soft tissues. Superficially visible plexiform neurofibromas were reported in 26.7% of patients with NF1 in one population based study.1 In a recent study, Tonsgard et al 5performed CT on 91 adults with NF1 and found that 20% had plexiform neurofibromas in the chest and 40% in the abdomen or pelvis. Plexiform neurofibromas are a potent cause of disfigurement, impaired function, and emotional distress. However, the growth characteristics of these lesions have not been determined and periods of rapid growth may be followed by relative quiescence.
About 4% of patients with NF1 develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours which arise within plexiform neurofibromas and often carry a poor prognosis.6 The tumours may metastasise to the lung, brain, liver, bone, soft tissue, regional lymph nodes, skin, and retroperitoneum.7 Optimal management is dependent on early and accurate histological grading and staging of the disease, but malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours are often difficult to detect and may metastasise to many different sites. Pain, rapid increase in the size of a neurofibroma, and the development of neurological deficit are clinical indicators of malignancy, but may also be features of benign plexiform neurofibromas. Magnetic resonance imaging locates the site and extent of the plexiform neurofibroma but is not reliable in detecting malignant change.8 Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours often contain heterogeneous areas, biopsy of a small part of the lesion does not always reflect the overall character of the tumour, and high grade areas may be missed. Total removal of the tumour may not be feasible or may result in significant morbidity because of the involvement of surrounding structures.
Positron emission tomography with the glucose analogue18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) is a dynamic imaging technique which permits the visualisation and quantification of glucose metabolism in cells and reflects the increase in metabolism in malignant tumours.9 Previous studies of soft tissue sarcomas have suggested that 18FDG PET successfully detects soft tissue sarcomas and metastases and can give an indication of the histological grade.10-15 There have been no previous studies using 18FDG PET to identify malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in NF1.
In this study, we evaluated the ability of 18FDG PET to detect malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours, arising from plexiform neurofibromas in patients with NF1.
The patients were recruited between 1996 and 1998 from our multidisciplinary neurofibromatosis clinic and comprised 400 patients. Overall, 35% of our patients have plexiform neurofibromas. A clinical and neurological examination was carried out on patients reporting pain, increased size, or neurological deficit in a plexiform neurofibroma. We report our experience with the first 18 patients.
Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 18 patients with a 1.5 Tesla superconducting system (Philips Gyroscan S15, Philips Medical Systems). Images were taken in the axial and coronal planes with a slice thickness of 5 mm and an interscan distance of 0.5 mm. Coronal STIR images (TR/TE 2000/25, TI 150) were performed and axial T1 images (TR/TE 700/20) were carried out before and after the administration of gadolinium-meglumine-triaminepentacetic acid contrast medium at 0.2 ml/kg.
18FDG PET PROTOCOL
Imaging was carried out on all patients after a 6 hour fast. Localised imaging of the mass was performed in all patients and whole body or half body scans were carried out on seven patients. Data were acquired using an ECAT 951R whole body system (Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, TN, USA). The scanner has an image resolution of about 8 mm and an axial field view of 10.8 cm (one bed position equalled 10.8 cm). A whole body scan (not corrected for attenuation) was performed for 5 minutes per bed position, about 60 minutes after intravenous injection of 350 Mbq 18FDG. Localised attenuation corrected views of the mass were undertaken after the whole body study, if this was performed, using a combined protocol of a 10 minute transmission scan and a 15 minute emission scan. This allowed a semiquantitative calculation of the rate of 18FDG metabolism in the tumour to be made. The images were displayed as coronal, sagittal, and transaxial sections.
All scans were evaluated both qualitatively by visual inspection and semiquantitatively by means of the calculation of the standard uptake value (SUV). The SUV is the normalised measurement of18FDG uptake which is related to the regional metabolic rate of glucose, provided that the uptake of the tracer into the tumour has reached its maximum value.
Qualitative assessment was made by a senior nuclear medicine physician experienced in PET with the specific aim of establishing if the mass was benign or malignant. In addition, the distribution of the uptake of 18FDG within the tumours was noted. Patients who had symptoms and neurological deficit which could have arisen from more than one site, underwent whole or half body scans. In those patients, the 18FDG uptake by the tumour was compared with the liver, and those tumours with uptake greater than the liver were deemed to be malignant.
Quantitative assessment was made by the calculation of the SUV (see equation 1) for the tumour with correction for the partial volume effect. (the smallest spatial resolution is the pixel).
where Atumour is the tumour activity concentration (MBq ml[-1]), ID is the injected dose of FDG (MBq), BW is the body weight (g) and P is an experimentally determined partial volume correction. The SUV as a function of time, SUV(t), was calculated according to equation 2:
where C(t) is the activity concentration at time t measured using a 4.5 mm circular region of interest, A is the injected activity, M is the body mass, and G is a simple glucose correction factor (blood glucose concentration/4.5 mmol l-1). The SUV time was the time after the injection when the SUV the transmission/emission scan was performed.
All scans were reported blind, without knowledge of any other imaging modality that had been undertaken of the tumour of concern and before a definitive histological diagnosis of the mass.
The histological diagnosis and grading of the tumour was performed using the criteria of tumour differentiation, necrosis, and the mitotic count to determine whether the tumour was low, intermediate, or high grade.16
The SUV results for malignant and benign tumours were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test and two tailed p values have been quoted.
Between 1996 and 1998, 10 females and eight males with NF1 presented with pain, enlargement, or neurological deficit associated with a plexiform neurofibroma (table 1). The median age of the patients was 23.5 years with an age range of 12–62 years. Twenty three lesions were detected on MRI and four patients had more than one plexiform neurofibroma. Sixteen plexiform neurofibromas were visible in the limbs, eight proximally and eight distally, one was identified on MRI in the brachial plexus (figs 1 and 2), two were detected in the neck and four in the trunk.
Pain persisting for more than 1 month and interfering with daily activities, was a feature in 17 from 23 tumours. Increase in size was present in 19 of 19 visible tumours. Neurological deficit was present in 14 of 23 tumours.
Five patients with NF1 had seven malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours and histological examination showed four high grade and three low grade tumours. Three of the high grade tumours were triton tumours exhibiting rhabdomyoblastic features (table 2, cases 2–5). The median age of these patients was 23 years with an age range of 17–62 years. One patient had severe pain (waking her from sleep) and neurological deficit caused by a prevertebral plexiform neurofibroma at the level of L1 and 18FDG PET indicated that the lesion was malignant (case 1). However, biopsy was technically difficult as the lesion was in close proximity to the aorta and it was not possible to confirm the diagnosis histologically.
Fifteen benign plexiform neurofibromas were diagnosed in 12 patients with NF1 and histology confirmed the findings in four patients (cases 7, 8, 13, and 15, table 2). The median age of patients with benign plexiform neurofibromas was 30.5 years with an age range of 12–35 years.
18FDG PET: QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT
The radiologist assessed 23 plexiform neurofibromas from 18 patients and on visual inspection reported 13 plexiform neurofibromas as benign and 10 as malignant. No malignant tumours were classified as benign, but two benign tumours were rated as malignant (cases 7 and 8). Histology was not diagnostic in one plexiform neurofibroma which was deemed to be malignant (case 1).
18FDG PET: QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT
The SUV was calculated in 20 tumours (table 2, fig 3). The mean SUV for five malignant tumours was 5.4 (SD 2.4), range 2.7–8.4, which was significantly higher than the SUV for 15 benign tumours, which was 1.54 (SD 0.7,) range 0.56–3.3 (Mann-Whitney U test=1.5, p (two tailed) 0.002 (case 1 excluded from the analysis)).
The mean time after 18FDG injection to when the SUV was calculated for 20 tumours was 111 minutes, median 105.5 minutes, range 45–206 minutes (case 1 excluded). The mean SUV time for five malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours was 108 minutes, median 90 minutes, range 53–175 minutes and for 15 benign plexiform neurofibromas it was 111 minutes, median 121 minutes, range 45–206 minutes.
Eighteen patients with NF1 were reassessed 6–26 months (median 9.5 months) after 18FDG PET was performed (table 3). Two of the five patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours died from lung metastases, 25 months and 8 months after presentation (cases 3 and 4). Three patients are currently asymptomatic 5 months after surgery (case 5), 12 months after surgery (case 6), and 26 months after surgery and radiotherapy (case 2). The patient with a prevertebral plexiform neurofibroma at L1 and inconclusive histology has persistent symptoms of pain and neurological deficit 9 months after presentation.
Five plexiform neurofibromas were excised in four patients and were benign. These patients have remained asymptomatic 15 months, 3 months, 10 months, and 26 months after surgery (cases 7, 8, 13, and 15). Eight patients with 10 plexiform neurofibromas which were thought to be benign on 18FDG PET did not undergo surgery, either because the patient refused surgery or the risk of morbidity was too high. They were followed up for 3 to 26 months after presentation (median 9 months). Four of these patients originally presented with pain arising from a plexiform neurofibroma (cases 9, 10, 12, and 17). On follow up, the pain had resolved in all patients except patient 10 who experienced aching in her leg after prolonged standing at work. All patients had reported an increase in size of the plexiform neurofibroma on presentation. Subsequently, six patients reported no further change in size, one patient reported a decrease in size (case 17), and in one case the lesion was in the pelvis and not visible to the patient (case 14). Four patients presented with neurological deficit (cases 12,14,16, and 18) and the deficit remained unchanged on follow up (table 3).
Qualitative assessment identified all the malignant tumours but yielded false positive results in two lesions. Quantitative assessment showed a significant difference in mean SUV between benign and malignant lesions. However, fig 3 shows an overlap between benign and malignant lesions between SUV 2.7 and 3.3. A cut off of 2.5 for the SUV would yield only one false positive result. Cases 3 and 4 were incorrectly thought to have malignant lesions and in these cases the SUV was calculated at 45–60 minutes after 18FDG injection. We have recently shown that high grade soft tissue sarcomas attain a peak activity concentration about 4 hours after injection of18FDG and benign lesions reach a maximum after 30 minutes.17 Increased separation between benign and malignant lesions could be obtained by calculating the SUV at about 200 minutes after injection of 18FDG.
Clinical symptoms did not help us distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Features considered to suggest malignancy, pain, increase in size of the lesion, and neurological deficit were all found in both benign and malignant lesions. All the malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours were painful, but eight patients with benign plexiform neurofibromas also complained of pain. Patient 17 noted a temporary increase in size of a plexiform neurofibroma on the left arm. This could be attributed to bleeding within the lesion which subsequently resolved. Conceivably, the presence of pain, increase in size, and neurological deficit in a benign plexiform neurofibroma reflect a period of active growth of the neurofibroma and the symptoms resolve or improve when the plexiform neurofibroma becomes quiescent. The natural history of plexiform neurofibromas has not been determined and we are participating in a multicentre study coordinated by Boston Children's Hospital to consider this issue.
The detection of malignant change in plexiform neurofibromas using clinical characteristics, MRI, and biopsy is extremely difficult. Our study has shown that 18FDG PET is a useful non-invasive method of identifying malignant change in plexiform neurofibromas in patients with NFT1. We are undertaking a prospective study with appropriate timing of the SUV after injection of 18FDG and histological examination in all cases to confirm the result of our retrospective study.
We thank Dr J Golding from the department of Psychology, University of Westminster, for statistical advice.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.