rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:798 doi:10.1136/jnnp.68.6.798
  • Correspondence

“Can't you use another vaccine”? Postrabies vaccination encephalitis

  1. I DERAKHSHAN
  1. 415 Morris Street, Suite 405, Charleston
  2. West Virginia 25301, USA
  3. Irajsudi{at}AOL.com

      I read with interest the letter of Chau et al related to iatrogenic disseminated encephalomyelitis, in a man bitten “by his own apparantly normal dog”.1Whereas I appreciate the novelty of documenting such entities with brain MRI, I wish to question the reasoning behind the practice of antirabies vaccination in similar doubtful circumstances. I have commented on that issue in another occasion.2 I have also documented instances of excessive enthusiasm, often encountered in situations such as those under discussion, in a research project conducted at the Pasteur Institute in Tehran, Iran.3 There is no justification for vaccinating a person simply because of fear when the remedy itself is to be feared even more, as documented by Chuaet al.

      References

      1. NGUYEN VINH CHAU,
      2. TRAN TINH HIEN,
      3. JEREMY FARRAR
      1. Centre for Tropical Diseases Ho Chi Min City, 190 Ben Ham Tu, Quan 5, Ho Chi Min City, Vietnam

          The authors reply:

          We thank Derakhshan for his comments on our case report of iatrogenic disseminated encephalomyelitis after use of the suckling mouse brain postrabies exposure vaccination. We were not responsible for the postexposure vaccination, which was administered in a provincial hospital in central VietNam. However, in the circumstances (and in the absence of the human diploid cell tissue culture vaccine) we think that it was appropriate to use the vaccine in this case. The dog had previously been well behaved and it was highly uncharacteristic for it to bite its owner. After the event the dog disappeared into the forest and was not seen again. Hence, it was not possible to retrieve the brain for analysis, as is usual in most cases.

          The mortality from rabies is essentially 100%, a figure that can be reduced dramatically by the expeditious use of the suckling mouse brain vaccine after exposure. We agree with Derakhshan's comments on excessive enthusisasm for any medication, and obviously the relative risks and potential benefits must always be balanced. In a disease with a 100% mortality, where a potentially effective treatment is associated with a severe side effect in only 1:27 000 cases it would seem reasonable to use the treatment. At this centre we vaccinate 2000 people every year after a dog bite, we see about 50 people a year die of rabies. We would therefore anticipate seeing a case of iatrogenic disseminated encephalomyelitis after use of the suckling mouse brain postrabies exposure vaccination once every 13.5 years. In the same period we would see 675 people dying from the disease.

          This Article

          Services

          1. Request permissions

          Responses

          1. Submit a response
          2. No responses published

          Social bookmarking

          Latest from Practical Neurology

          Latest from Practical Neurology

          Register for free content


          Free sample
          This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JNNP.
          View free sample issue >>

          Free archive
          The full back archive is now available for JNNP. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
          Register to access the free archive >>

          Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

        • BMJ Careers - Latest Neurology and Neurosurgery jobs

          Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs