Statistics from Altmetric.com
Paccioni granulations are normal anatomical structures that correspond to very enlarged arachnoid villi.1 They are involved in the filtration of CSF from the subarachnoid space to the venous system. Hypertropic Paccioni granulations (hPgs), usually secondary to high CSF pressure, can be symptomatic and responsible for lytic skull lesions or dural destruction.2 3 More exceptionally, the development of hPgs within the venous lumen makes their distinction from other pathological intravascular processes complicated. We report a case of unusual headache in a migrainous patient in whom hPgs in venous sinuses first led to an erroneous diagnosis of venous thrombophlebitis. This finding emphasises the importance of MRI as a mode of distinguishing between hPgs and dural venous thrombosis and suggests a possible link between hPgs and headache.
A 48 year old woman with a 25 year history of migraine without aura consulted for a recent unusual headache. She was treated with spironolactone and altizide for hypertension, and norprogesterone. Biological hyperthyroidism was also diagnosed due to toxic nodules and surgical treatment was planned. For 1 month, every night, she was woken at 2 00 am by severe, slightly pulsating, left sided hemicranial pain, sometimes associated with nausea without sonophobia. The headache was worsened by effort or by walking and lasted a few hours. Attacks were exclusively nocturnal. Treatment with paracetamol, codeine, or caffeine were ineffective. General and neurological examination proved normal. Axial brain MRI (GEMSON-SYS 1.0T) showed bilateral, round, clearly defined images within the left and right lateral venous sinuses. Intravascular masses were hypointense on T1 weighted images and hyperintense on the T2 weighted scans. No brain oedema or venous infarction was seen. No enhancement of the lesions was seen after gadolinium injection (figure A). A venous MR angiogram showed only the image located in the left lateral sinus, which did not affect blood flow (figure B). Dural venous sinus thrombosis was diagnosed and continuous intravenous heparin infusion was administered. The headache was unchanged under therapeutic anticoagulation. Ocular fundi did not show papillary oedema. The CSF was clear with a normal opening pressure (140 mm H2O), cell counts (2 lymphocytes/μl), and protein concentration (40 mg/dl). The headache disappeared a few hours after lumbar puncture. Final diagnosis of hPg was made after further examination of MRI images. Heparin treatment was stopped and the patient left the unit with oral amytriptiline treatment (20 mg/day). Two months after discharge, nocturnal headache was absent and cerebral MRI was similar to previous scans.
This case illustrates the possibility of mistaken diagnosis due to the presence of hPgs in the context of unusual headache in migrainous patients. The prevalence of hPgs in the general population is not currently known. Among 295 postmortem cerebral dural veins, Browderet al described the presence of two cases of hPgs in the superior sagittal sinus and 23 smaller hPgs in the lateral sinuses. In a retrospective radiological study,4 hPgs were seen within the venous system in 24% of 573 contrast enhanced CT scans and in 13% of 100 brain MR images. However, radiological examination was not performed in non-symptomatic patients and, therefore, exact prevalence was not determined.
The presence of an experienced MRI radiologist reduces the risk of confusion between hPgs and thrombi or intravascular malignant masses. Radiological characteristics for distinguishing thrombosis from hPgs are summarised in the table. Among the signs that seem useful, hPg morphology seems particularly important; hPgs are classically round, clearly defined structures, preferentially localised in the lateral sinus in the vicinity of the venous entrance.4 These morphological characteristics on CT and MRI are so suggestive of hPgs that further radiological examination is unnecessary.1 4
Clinical symptoms of hPg have not been previously reported in detail.1 5 6 Browder et alpostulated that they are asymptomatic, probably explained by their slow growth. Nevertheless, among symptoms regularly reported, recent or unusual headache is often described. In most patients, as in ours, headache was first thought to be symptomatic because of its unusual intensity, nocturnal appearance, consistent topography, and its resistance to analgesic drugs.7 One approach linking hPgs to headache is that they can induce symptomatic intracranial hypertension due to their effects on venous blood flow.1However, even though rapid improvement after lumbar puncture is suggestive of such a mechanism, we noticed neither high CSF pressure nor papilloedema. It may be that hPgs have no role in the occurrence of headache. In fact, headache is a frequent complaint in the general population often leading to further investigation by radiological imagery that can show hPgs.8 Moreover, in our patient, as in the cases reported by Zagardo and Mamourian and Towfighi, spontaneous resolution of headache was seen without any action being taken on hPgs, equally suggesting that they are not involved in this affection.
In conclusion, hPgs have a particular aspect within the intravenous lumen contrasting with that of thrombi or malignant masses in the venous dural veins. Their radiological aspect is so particular that they can be easily diagnosed, making further imagery unnecessary. Further studies are required to improve our understanding of the relation between hPg and headache.