rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:348-350 doi:10.1136/jnnp.74.3.348
  • Paper

Agreement among neurologists on the clinical diagnosis of dystonia at different body sites

  1. G Logroscino1,
  2. P Livrea2,
  3. D Anaclerio3,
  4. M S Aniello2,
  5. G Benedetto4,
  6. G Cazzato5,
  7. L Giampietro3,
  8. G Manobianca1,
  9. M Marra6,
  10. D Martino2,
  11. P Pannarale7,
  12. R Pulimeno8,
  13. V Santamato7,
  14. G Defazio2
  1. 1Department of Neurology, Ospedale Miulli, Acquaviva (Bari), Italy
  2. 2Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
  3. 3Department of Neurology, Conversano Hospital, Conversano, Italy
  4. 4Department of Neurology, “Casa di Cura Monte Imperatore”, Noci, Italy
  5. 5Department of Neurology, “Casa di Cura Villa Verde”, Lecce, Italy
  6. 6Department of Neurology, Casarano Hospital, Casarano, Italy
  7. 7Department of Neurology, Di Venere Hospital, Bari, Italy
  8. 8Department of Neurology, Gallipoli Hospital, Gallipoli, Italy
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Giovanni Defazio, Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, I-70124 Bari, Italy;
 gdefazio{at}neurol.uniba.it
  • Received 13 September 2002
  • Accepted 13 November 2002

Abstract

Objective: To study the reliability of the diagnosis of blepharospasm, oromandibular dystonia, cervical dystonia, and writer's cramp among neurologists.

Methods: 12 patients with adult onset focal segmental dystonia were videotaped in a standardised way. The tape was sent to six neurologists who are involved in clinical practice without a specific interest in movement disorders (general neurologists), and to four neurologists expert in movement disorders. The observers had to recognise whether the patients were affected by dystonia and to distinguish among blepharospasm, oromandibular dystonia, cervical dystonia, and writer's cramp. Interobserver reliability was assessed by κ statistics, and the degree of agreement was classified according to the Landis classification.

Results: The 10 neurologists reached slight to moderate agreement on the diagnosis of these four disorders. When the observers were subdivided according with their professional experience in the field, a moderate to perfect agreement on the diagnosis was achieved by specialists in movement disorders, and a fair to moderate agreement by the general neurologists.

Conclusions: Neurologists may have different ability to recognise adult onset focal dystonia, depending on their experience and on the type of dystonia.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs