Intracranial pressure (ICP) is derived from cerebral blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulatory dynamics and can be affected in the course of many diseases of the central nervous system. Monitoring of ICP requires an invasive transducer, although some attempts have been made to measure it non-invasively. Because of its dynamic nature, instant CSF pressure measurement using the height of a fluid column via lumbar puncture may be misleading. An averaging over 30 minutes should be the minimum, with a period of overnight monitoring in conscious patients providing the optimal standard. Computer-aided recording with online waveform analysis of ICP is very helpful.
Although there is no “Class I” evidence, ICP monitoring is useful, if not essential, in head injury, poor grade subarachnoid haemorrhage, stroke, intracerebral haematoma, meningitis, acute liver failure, hydrocephalus, benign intracranial hypertension, craniosynostosis etc. Information which can be derived from ICP and its waveforms includes cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), regulation of cerebral blood flow and volume, CSF absorption capacity, brain compensatory reserve, and content of vasogenic events. Some of these parameters allow prediction of prognosis of survival following head injury and optimisation of “CPP-guided therapy”. In hydrocephalus CSF dynamic tests aid diagnosis and subsequent monitoring of shunt function.
- intracranial pressure
- waveform analysis
- ABP, arterial blood pressure
- AMP, pulse amplitude of ICP
- CBF, cerebral blood flow
- CPP, cerebral perfusion pressure
- CSF, cerebrospinal fluid
- ICP, intracranial pressure
- PRx, pressure-reactivity index
- RAP, index of compensatory reserve
- Slow, magnitude of slow waves of ICP
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- ABP, arterial blood pressure
- AMP, pulse amplitude of ICP
- CBF, cerebral blood flow
- CPP, cerebral perfusion pressure
- CSF, cerebrospinal fluid
- ICP, intracranial pressure
- PRx, pressure-reactivity index
- RAP, index of compensatory reserve
- Slow, magnitude of slow waves of ICP
In most organs of the human body the environmental pressure for blood perfusion is either low, or coupled to atmospheric pressure. The environmental pressure for the brain differs in this respect as brain is surrounded and protected by a stiff skull. A rise in intracranial pressure (ICP) may impede blood flow and cause ischaemia.
Intracranial pressure is derived from the circulation of cerebral blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (however, it is not certain whether the operator in the formula should be represented by a simple addition): ICP = ICPvascular + ICPCSF.
The vascular component1,2 is difficult to express quantitatively. It is probably derived from the pulsation of the cerebral blood volume detected and averaged by non-linear mechanisms of regulation of cerebral blood volume. More generally, multiple variables such as the arterial pressure, autoregulation, and cerebral venous outflow all contribute to the vascular component. The other circulatory CSF component may be expressed using Davson’s equation3: ICPCSF = (resistance to CSF outflow) × (CSF formation) + (pressure in sagittal sinus).
Any factor, which under physiological (for example, compression of jugular veins during a Queckenstedt test) or pathological conditions (brain swelling, space occupying lesion, obstruction of CSF pathway) disturbs this circulation, may provoke an increase in ICP.
ICP measurements are used to estimate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) as follows: mean CPP = mean arterial blood pressure (ABP) − mean ICP. CPP represents the pressure gradient acting across the cerebrovascular bed, and hence is an important factor in regulation of the cerebral blood flow (CBF).4 Sufficient CPP is required to maintain a stable CBF. The autoregulatory reserve is interpreted as the difference between current mean CPP and lower limit of autoregulation. Low CPP (a threshold of 60–70 mm Hg is generally accepted in adults) may result in exhaustion of the autoregulatory reserve. However, policies to therapeutically maintain a high CPP are controversial. If the cerebral vessels are non-reactive, an increase in CPP may result in hyperaemia, increase in vasogenic oedema, and a secondary increase in ICP.5,6 It is also probable that patient and time dependent differences in the optimal level of CPP may be considerable. Thus, the border between adequate and non-adequate CPP should be assessed individually and frequently.
METHODS OF MEASUREMENT
An intraventricular drain connected to an external pressure transducer is still considered to be “golden standard” method.7,8 ICP can be controlled by CSF drainage and the transducer may be zeroed externally. However, after five days of monitoring the risk of infection starts to increase, with an overall risk estimated to be about 5%.9 Insertion of the ventricular catheter may be difficult or impossible in cases of advanced brain swelling. Modern ventricular, subdural, or intraparenchymal microtransducers (most popular types: Camino ICP Bolt; Camino Laboratories, San Diego, California, USA; and Codman MicroSensor, Johnson and Johnson Professional Inc, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA) reduce infection rate and risk of haemorrhage9 and have excellent metrological properties as revealed during bench tests—that is, bandwidth, linearity.10 Generally, uniformly distributed ICP can be probably seen only when CSF circulates freely between all its natural pools, equilibrating pressure everywhere. When little or no CSF volume is left due to brain swelling, the assumption of one, uniform value of ICP is questionable. With the most common intraparenchymal probes, measured pressure may be compartmentalised and not necessarily representative of real ICP—that is, ventricular CSF pressure.11 Microtransducers cannot be generally re-zeroed after insertion and considerable zero drift can sometimes occur in long term monitoring.12 This problem has been addressed in the balloon-like Spiegelberg transducer which may zero itself every set time interval, although its limited bandwidth may make most of the methods used for the ICP waveform analysis impossible.13 Contemporary epidural sensors are much more reliable than 10 years ago. But the question as to whether epidural pressure can express ICP with confidence and under all circumstances is still unanswered.
Lumbar CSF pressure is very seldom measured in neuro-intensive care. This form of assessment of craniospinal dynamics is more often used in hydrocephalus and benign intracranial hypertension. It is important to emphasise that decent monitoring over a period of at least half an hour with recording of pressure and pulse amplitude should be used as a “golden standard”. Manometric assessment by measuring the height of the CSF column may be misleading as CSF pressure may vary considerably with time.14 Attempts to monitor ICP non-invasively are still in a phase of technical evaluation.15 The most promising methods are based on transcranial ultrasonography16–18—see below.
TYPICAL EVENTS AND TRENDS IN ICP MONITORING
It is difficult to establish a universal “normal value” for ICP as it depends on age, body posture, and clinical conditions. In the horizontal position, the normal ICP in healthy adult subjects was reported to be within the range of 7–15 mm Hg.19 In the vertical position it is negative with a mean of around −10 mm Hg, but not exceeding −15 mm Hg.20
The definition of raised ICP depends on the specific pathology. In hydrocephalus, a pressure above 15 mm Hg can be regarded as elevated. Following head injury, anything above 20 mm Hg is abnormal and aggressive treatment usually starts above 25 mm Hg. It is important to recognise that ICP in most cases varies with time. Decent averaging for at least 30 minutes is needed to calculate “mean ICP”. The patient should rest in a horizontal position during the measurement and avoid movement, speaking, etc. Overnight monitoring during natural sleep, which provides a “grand average” with a good description of the dynamics of the pressure, should be regarded as the “gold standard” in conscious patients.
When monitored continuously in acute states (head injury, poor grade subarachnoid haemorrhage, intracerebral haematoma etc.), mean ICP may be classified into relatively few patterns (fig 1).
Low and stable ICP (below 20 mm Hg)—for example, seen in patients following uncomplicated head injury (fig 1A). Such a pattern is also commonly seen in the initial period after brain trauma before the brain swelling evolves.
High and stable ICP (above 20 mm Hg)—the most common picture to follow head injury (fig 1B).
Vasogenic waves—“B” waves (fig 1C) and plateau waves (fig 1D).
ICP waves related to changes in arterial pressure and hyperaemic events (fig 1 E–G).
Refractory intracranial hypertension (fig 1H). This usually leads to death unless radical measures—for example, surgical decompression, are applied.
However, there is much more information in the ICP waveform than in the time averaged ICP mean value alone. It is important to bear in mind how little information is available in the fluid column in the manometer line connected to a lumbar puncture needle!
WAVEFORM ANALYSIS OF ICP
The ICP waveform consists of three components, which overlap in the time domain, but can be separated in the frequency domain (fig 2). The pulse waveform has several harmonic components; of these the fundamental component has a frequency equal to the heart rate. The amplitude of this component (AMP) is very useful for the evaluation of various indices. The respiratory waveform is related to the frequency of the respiratory cycle (8–20 cycles per minute). “Slow waves” are usually not as precisely defined as in the original Lundberg thesis.8 All components that have a spectral representation within the frequency limits of 0.05–0.0055 Hz (20 s to 3 min period) can be classified as slow waves. The magnitude of these waves can be calculated as the square root of the power of the signal of the passband of the equivalent frequency range at the output of the digital filter.
PRESSURE–VOLUME COMPENSATORY RESERVE
Theoretically, the compensatory reserve can be studied through the relation between ICP and changes in volume of the intracerebral space, known as the “pressure–volume curve”.22,23 The index called RAP (correlation coefficient (R) between AMP amplitude (A) and mean pressure (P); index of compensatory reserve) can be derived by calculating the linear correlation between consecutive, time averaged data points of AMP and ICP (usually 40 of such samples are used) acquired over a reasonably long period to average over respiratory and pulse waves (usually 6–10 s periods). This index indicates the degree of correlation between AMP and mean ICP over short periods of time (~4 min).
A RAP coefficient close to 0 indicates lack of synchronisation between changes in AMP and mean ICP. This denotes a good pressure–volume compensatory reserve at low ICP (fig 3), where a change in volume produces no or very little change of the pressure. When RAP rises to +1, AMP varies directly with ICP and this indicates that the “working point” of the intracranial space shifts to the right towards the steep part of the pressure–volume curve. Here compensatory reserve is low; therefore any further rise in volume may produce a rapid increase in ICP. Following head injury and subsequent brain swelling, RAP is usually close to +1. With any further increase in ICP, AMP decreases and RAP values fall below zero. This occurs when the cerebral autoregulatory capacity is exhausted and the pressure–volume curve bends to the right as the capacity of cerebral arterioles to dilate in response to a CPP decrement is exhausted, and they tend to collapse passively. This indicates terminal cerebrovascular derangement with a decrease in pulse pressure transmission from the arterial bed to the intracranial compartment.
CEREBROVASCULAR PRESSURE REACTIVITY
Another ICP derived index is the pressure-reactivity index (PRx), which incorporates the philosophy of assessing cerebrovascular reactions by observing the response of ICP to slow spontaneous changes in ABP.24 When the cerebrovascular bed is normally reactive, any change in ABP produces an inverse change in cerebral blood volume and hence ICP. When reactivity is disturbed, changes in ABP are passively transmitted to ICP. Using computational methods similar to those used for the calculation of the RAP index, PRx is determined by calculating the correlation coefficient between 40 consecutive, time averaged data points of ICP and ABP. A positive PRx signifies a positive gradient of the regression line between the slow components of ABP and ICP, which we hypothesise to be associated with passive behaviour of a non-reactive vascular bed (fig 4A). A negative value of PRx reflects a normally reactive vascular bed, as ABP waves provoke inversely correlated waves in ICP (fig 4B). This index correlates well with indices of autoregulation based on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography.25 Furthermore, abnormal values of both PRx and RAP, indicative respectively of poor autoregulation or deranged cerebrospinal compensatory reserve, have been demonstrated to be predictive of a poor outcome following head injury.5
OTHER METHODS OF ICP ANALYSIS
One of the priorities in brain monitoring is to develop a technique which helps in predicting decompensation or herniation. Early works focused on intracranial volume–pressure response26 which evolved in time into continuous monitoring of brain compliance.27 Such a method relies on the evaluation of the pressure response to known small volume additions by inflating and deflating a balloon inserted within the cerebrospinal space. The method has been implemented in the Spiegelberg Brain Compliance monitor (Spiegelberg GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) and initial trials indicated it might be useful in various scenarios.28,29 Its correlation with outcome remains to be demonstrated.
Analysis of the pulse waveform of ICP, known as high-frequency-centroid, was based on evaluation of the power spectrum of a single pulse ICP waveform and calculation of its “power-weighted average frequency” within the frequency range of 5−15 Hz. High-frequency centroid was demonstrated to decrease with increasing ICP and then increase in the state of refractory intracranial hypertension where the blood flow regulation mechanism failed.30
Pulse transmission between arterial pressure and mean ICP has been investigated by various groups.31–33 It depends upon assumptions about the linearity of the transmission model. Such assumptions are probably unrealistic particularly in pathological circumstances.
The ratio of respiratory wave to pulse amplitude of ICP was believed to be predictive of a worse outcome after head injury. Modulation of pulse waveform by the respiratory cycle has been demonstrated to correlate with brain compliance. Attempts have been made to use this for diagnosis in patients with hydrocephalus.34
Recently, the power of slow waves of ICP was reported to be predictive of outcome in patients with intracranial hypertension following head injury. A low content of slow waves in the overall ICP dynamics was associated with a fatal outcome21 highlighting a possible link of these events with cerebral autoregulation.35
PRACTICAL USE OF THE ICP DERIVED PARAMETERS: “OPTIMAL CPP” AND MULTIPLE TREND ANALYSIS
Both PRx and RAP can be used to evaluate secondary variables that combine the value of absolute ICP and CPP with information about the state of autoregulatory and compensatory reserves. PRx plotted against CPP gives a “U shape” curve.5 This indicates that for the majority of patients there is a value of the CPP in which pressure-reactivity is optimal. This optimal pressure can be estimated by plotting and analysing the PRx–CPP curve in a sequential six hour wide time-moving window online. It has been demonstrated in a group of retrospectively evaluated patients that the greater the distance between the current and the “optimal” CPP the worse the outcome. This potentially useful methodology attempts to refine CPP oriented therapy.5 Both, too low (ischaemia), and, too high, CPP (hyperaemia and secondary increase in ICP) are detrimental. Hence, we have suggested that CPP should be optimised to maintain cerebral perfusion in the globally most favourable state.5
No matter how sophisticated new variables or outcome-predicting models become, the most useful tool at the bedside is a computer screen, which presents the trends of multiple parameters with time. This gives an opportunity to react to a crisis situation, understand the cerebrospinal dynamics in multiple dimensions and predict an optimal strategy for the individual patient’s care (fig 5).
ASSOCIATION WITH OUTCOME FOLLOWING SEVERE HEAD INJURY
In severe head injury an averaged ICP above 25 mm Hg over the whole period of monitoring increases risk of death twofold. Averaged values of the RAP and PRx indices are also strong predictors of fatal outcome. Both these indices suggest that good vascular reactivity is an important element of brain homoeostasis, enabling the brain to protect itself against an uncontrollable rise of the intracerebral volume. A low value of slow waves of ICP is also indicative of a fatal outcome following head injury.
As ICP, PRx, and the power of ICP slow waves are independent predictors of outcome, these three variables, although mutually correlated, should be considered jointly in any outcome analysis.
Mean CPP has become an actively controlled variable and hence has lost its predictive power for outcome. It does not mean that traditional short term decreases in CPP (“CPP insults”) have become any more benign, but they are probably better managed nowadays, and with baseline CPP above 65–70 mm Hg they do not frequently produce ischaemia. This is, probably, one of the most spectacular “success stories” of CPP oriented protocols. However, there is still lack of “Class I” evidence indicating that CPP oriented therapy is clearly beneficial. Robertson et al36 compared CPP and ICP oriented therapies and showed a decrease in ischaemic insults in CPP oriented therapy but an increase in respiratory complications with no overall difference in outcome.
ICP IN HYDROCEPHALUS AND BENIGN INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION
ICP in chronic diseases should be interpreted slightly differently. The problems are related more to disturbance of the CSF circulation. Increased ICP signifies increased resistance to CSF outflow37 or increased cerebral venous outflow pressure,38 rather than exhausted cerebrospinal compensatory reserve created by a decreased volume in either one or both of the two main buffering components—CSF and venous blood volume, as in head injury.
In more chronic conditions of ventricular dilatation, where ICP is not greatly raised, obstruction to CSF absorption may be confirmed by CSF infusion tests (ventricular or lumbar) taking care to adapt the technique to the site of any obstruction.39 The infusion study can be performed via the lumbar CSF space or via a preimplanted ventricular access device. In both cases, two needles are inserted (22 G spinal needles for lumbar tests; 25 G butterfly needles for ventricular studies). One needle is connected to a pressure transducer via a stiff saline-filled tube and the other to an infusion pump mounted on a purpose-built trolley containing a pressure amplifier and personal computer running software written inhouse. After 10 minutes of baseline measurement, the infusion of normal saline at a rate of 1.5 ml/min or 1 ml/min (if the baseline pressure was higher than 15 mm Hg) is started and continued until a steady state ICP plateau is achieved (fig 6). If the ICP increases to 40 mm Hg, the infusion is interrupted. Following cessation of the saline infusion, ICP is recorded until it decreases to steady baseline levels. All compensatory parameters are calculated using computer supported methods based on physiological models of the CSF circulation.40 Baseline ICP and RCSF characterise the static properties of the CSF circulation. RCSF is calculated as the pressure increase during the infusion, divided by the infusion rate. A value below 13 mm Hg/(ml/min) characterises normal CSF circulation41; above 18 mm Hg/(ml/min) the CSF circulation is clearly disturbed42; between 13 mm Hg/(ml/min) and 18 mm Hg/(ml/min) there is a grey zone, when other compensatory parameters and other clinical investigations should be considered to make a decision about shunting. Because the resistance to CSF outflow both in normal individuals43 and in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH)44 increases with age, it is very likely that the “critical threshold” of normal and abnormal RCSF should be also age adjusted.
The cerebrospinal elasticity coefficient (E1) and AMP waveform express the dynamic components of CSF pressure–volume compensation.45–47 E1 describes the compliance of the CSF compartment according to the formula: compliance of CSF space = Ci = 1/[E1×(ICP−p0)], where p0 is the unknown reference pressure level, representing the hydrostatic difference between the site of ICP measurement and the pressure indifferent point of the cerebrospinal axis.48 Cerebrospinal compliance is inversely proportional to ICP, therefore comparison between different subjects can be made only at the same level of the difference: ICP−p0. E1 is independent of ICP, thus this coefficient is a much more convenient parameter when comparing individual patients. A low value of E1 (less than 0.2/ml) is specific for a compliant system, whereas a higher value indicates decreased pressure–volume compensatory reserve.
The AMP increases proportionally when the mean ICP rises. The proportionality ratio (the AMP/P index) characterises both the elastance of the cerebrospinal space and the transmission of arterial pulsations to the CSF compartment.41 Finally, the production of CSF fluid can be estimated using Davson’s equation. However, the sagittal sinus pressure (PSS) is unknown and cannot be easily measured without increasing the invasiveness of the whole procedure. Consequently, the PSS and CSF formation are estimated jointly using a non-linear model using the least square distance method during the computerised infusion test.40 It is important to mention that such an “estimate” of CSF production rate approximates CSF absorption, rather than the actual production rate. It is based upon the assumption that all circulating CSF is reabsorbed via the arachnoid granulations. In cases where significant CSF suffusion into brain parenchyma occurs, CSF production may be grossly underestimated.
An infusion study may be useful for the assessment of shunt function in vivo. The end-equilibrium pressure achieved during the test should not significantly exceed the shunt’s operating pressure increased by the hydrodynamic resistance of the opened shunt multiplied by the infusion rate. These values are readily available from the UK shunt evaluation laboratory (Academic Neurosurgical Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK) and can be used in clinical measurements to confirm shunt malfunction objectively.49 This is particularly important as an increasing number of shunt revisions obviously impedes the chance for uneventful management of hydrocephalus.50
Overnight ICP monitoring in patients with NHP may reveal a high incidence of slow waves during sleep which is a very helpful prognostic sign for the outcome following shunting51,52 (fig 7A). Benign intracranial hypertension seldom requires more than CSF pressure monitoring through a lumbar catheter or needle for an hour. When overnight ICP monitoring is performed in a patient with benign intracranial hypertension, baseline ICP is usually increased, the amplitude and frequency of “slow waves” is moderate, but the increased RAP index indicates reduced cerebrospinal compensatory reserve (fig 7B). Intermittent intracranial hypertension caused by sleep apnoea syndrome may cause symptoms similar to benign intracranial hypertension. Multimodal monitoring including ICP, Doppler blood flow velocity, and arterial blood oxygen saturation is useful (fig 7C).53
Although a number of centres employ ICP measurement and infusion studies, the selection of patients has not been shown to be more precise than when using the CSF tap test.54 Positive predictive power of the increased resistance to CSF outflow is generally high, but the negative predictive power is low—that is, patients with normal resistance to CSF outflow may sometimes improve following shunting. However, the same problem concerns CSF tap tests.55 Extending the period of CSF drainage to 72 hours seems to be an efficient solution but increases hospital stay and risk of complications.
ATTEMPTS TO MEASURE ICP AND CPP NON-INVASIVELY
It would be very helpful to measure ICP or CPP without invasive transducers. Transcranial Doppler examination,16 tympanic membrane displacement,15 and ultrasound “time of flight” techniques have been advocated.17
The description of transcranial Doppler sonography by Aaslid et al in 1982 permitted bedside monitoring of one index of cerebral blood flow, non-invasively, repeatedly, and even continuously.56 The problem has been that it is a “big tube technique”, which measures flow velocity in branches of the circle of Willis, most commonly the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Compliant branches of the MCA can be compared with two physiological pressure transducers. The pattern of blood flow within these tubes is certainly modulated by transmural pressure—that is, CPP, and the distal vascular resistance (also modulated by the CPP). But what is the calibration factor and how should we compensate for unknown non-linear distortion?
There is a reasonable correlation between the pulsatility index of MCA velocity and CPP after head injury but absolute measurements of CPP cannot be extrapolated.57 Others have suggested that “critical closing pressure” derived from flow velocity and arterial pressure waveform approximated the ICP.58 The accuracy of this method has, however, never been satisfactory.59
Aaslid et al60 suggested that an index of CPP could be derived from the ratio of the amplitudes of the first harmonics of the ABP and the MCA velocity (detected by transcranial Doppler sonography) multiplied by mean flow velocity. Recently, a method for the non-invasive assessment of CPP has been reported, derived from mean arterial pressure multiplied by the ratio of diastolic to mean flow velocity.61,62 This estimator can predict real CPP with an error of less than 10 mm Hg for more than 80% of measurements. This is of potential benefit for the continuous monitoring of changes in real CPP over time in situations where the direct measurement of CPP is not readily available.
A more complex method aimed at the non-invasive assessment of ICP has been introduced and tested by Schmidt et al.18 The method is based on the presumed linear transformation between arterial pressure and ICP waveforms. Coefficients of this transformation are derived from the database of real ABP and ICP recordings. Similar linear transformation is built, using the same database between flow velocity and arterial pressure. Then the model assumes linear relationship between arterial pressure and flow velocity and arterial pressure to ICP transformations. Multiple regression coefficients are calculated. Finally, for each prospective study, ICP is calculated using ABP to ICP transformation, formed from ABP to flow velocity transformation transposed using precalculated regression coefficients.
IS ICP MONITORING USEFUL
The continuous measurement of ICP is an essential modality in most brain monitoring systems. After a decade of enthusiastic attempts to introduce new modalities for brain monitoring (tissue oxygenation, microdialysis, cortical blood flow, transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, jugular bulb oxygen saturation) it is increasingly obvious that ICP is robust, only moderately invasive, and can be realistically conducted in regional hospitals.
Although there has been no randomised controlled trial about influence of ICP monitoring on overall outcome after following head injury, recent audit63 shows almost twofold lower mortality in neurosurgical centres, where ICP is usually monitored, versus general intensive care units, where it is not monitored. However, the availability of ICP monitoring is not the only difference between neurosurgical and general intensive care units that might explain the difference in mortality after head injury.
ICP waveform contains valuable information about the nature of cerebrospinal pathophysiology. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow and compliance of cerebrospinal system are both expressed in ICP. Methods of waveform analysis are useful both to derive this information and to guide the management of patients.
The value of ICP in acute states such as head injury, poor grade subarachnoid haemorrhage, and intracerebral haematoma depends on a close link between monitoring and therapy. CPP oriented protocols,64,65 osmotherapy66 and the “Lund protocol”6 cannot be conducted correctly without ICP guidance. A decision about decompressive craniectomy should be supported by the close inspection of the trend of ICP and, preferably, by information derived from its waveform.67 In encephalitis,68 acute liver failure,69 and cerebral infarction after stroke,70 ICP monitoring is used less commonly, however, an increasing number of reports highlight its importance.
A slightly different methodology for CSF pressure interpretation is applied in chronic states such as hydrocephalus or benign intracranial hypertension. In the first case assessment of CSF pressure–volume compensation and circulation are essential to optimise patient management.42,71 Volume-adding tests with parallel measurement of ICP and/or overnight ICP monitoring with waveform analysis have a special role. In patients with a shunt in situ, who present with persistent or recurring clinical symptoms, it helps to avoid unnecessary shunt revisions. This is particularly important as patients with a history of multiple shunt revision have a lower chance to achieve good outcome in the future. In benign intracranial hypertension72 or craniostenosis73 ICP monitoring has been documented as useful both for diagnosis and to document response to therapy.
In summary, ICP is a complex modality, which contains combined information about cerebral compensatory and CBF regulation mechanisms. Control of ICP requires continuous monitoring. ICP-derived indices help to understand the pathophysiology of developing events and facilitate patient care.
Many thanks to our colleagues participating in the head injury monitoring programme in Cambridge, UK, 1991–2002, whose experience, knowledge, and clinical material helped me to write this review: P Al-Rawi, D Chattfield, C Turner, M Balestreri, M Hiler, B Owler, A Pena, P Smielewski, SK Piechnik, LA Steiner, E Guazzo, PC Whetfield, P Minhas, M Soehle, R Kett-White, P Hutchinson, E Schmidt, B Schmidt, A Kumar, A Raabe, M Schuhmann, PJ Kirkpatrick, FK Matta, A Gupta, DK Menon, and nursing and research staff from Neuro Critical Care Unit and Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre.
↵* M Czosnyka is on leave from Warsaw University of Technology, Poland.
Grant support: Medical Research Council No G9439390 ID 65883.
Competing interests: none declared
This review is complementary to a review of raised ICP published in Hughes RAC, ed. Neurological Emergencies. London: BMJ Books, 2003.